139395 20240321220618.0 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.04.003 doi pmid:28478330 pmid 0010-0285 ISSN 1095-5623 ISSN altmetric:19872489 altmetric DZNE-2020-05717 English 150 Chen, Xiaoli P:(DE-2719)2811255 0 First author dzne Cue combination in human spatial navigation. Amsterdam 2017 Elsevier print Crossref Elsevier BV 2017-06-01 article DRIVER Output Types/Journal article DataCite Journal Article journal journal PUB:(DE-HGF)16 1710344351_30570 PUB:(DE-HGF) ARTICLE BibTeX JOURNAL_ARTICLE ORCID Journal Article 0 EndNote This project investigated the ways in which visual cues and bodily cues from self-motion are combined in spatial navigation. Participants completed a homing task in an immersive virtual environment. In Experiments 1A and 1B, the reliability of visual cues and self-motion cues was manipulated independently and within-participants. Results showed that participants weighted visual cues and self-motion cues based on their relative reliability and integrated these two cue types optimally or near-optimally according to Bayesian principles under most conditions. In Experiment 2, the stability of visual cues was manipulated across trials. Results indicated that cue instability affected cue weights indirectly by influencing cue reliability. Experiment 3 was designed to mislead participants about cue reliability by providing distorted feedback on the accuracy of their performance. Participants received feedback that their performance with visual cues was better and that their performance with self-motion cues was worse than it actually was or received the inverse feedback. Positive feedback on the accuracy of performance with a given cue improved the relative precision of performance with that cue. Bayesian principles still held for the most part. Experiment 4 examined the relations among the variability of performance, rated confidence in performance, cue weights, and spatial abilities. Participants took part in the homing task over two days and rated confidence in their performance after every trial. Cue relative confidence and cue relative reliability had unique contributions to observed cue weights. The variability of performance was less stable than rated confidence over time. Participants with higher mental rotation scores performed relatively better with self-motion cues than visual cues. Across all four experiments, consistent correlations were found between observed weights assigned to cues and relative reliability of cues, demonstrating that the cue-weighting process followed Bayesian principles. Results also pointed to the important role of subjective evaluation of performance in the cue-weighting process and led to a new conceptualization of cue reliability in human spatial navigation. 344 - Clinical and Health Care Research (POF3-344) G:(DE-HGF)POF3-344 POF3-344 POF III 0 2017-06-01 Crossref https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ 2018-05-04 Crossref http://www.elsevier.com/open-access/userlicense/1.0/ Dataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed, Adult MeSH Cues MeSH Feedback, Psychological: physiology MeSH Humans MeSH Psychomotor Performance: physiology MeSH Spatial Navigation: physiology MeSH Young Adult MeSH McNamara, Timothy P P:(DE-HGF)0 1 Kelly, Jonathan W P:(DE-HGF)0 2 Wolbers, Thomas P:(DE-2719)2810583 3 Last author dzne 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.04.003 : Elsevier BV, 2017-06-01 105-144 journal-article Crossref Cognitive Psychology 95 2017 0010-0285 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.04.003 Vol. 95, p. 105 - 144 PERI:(DE-600)1462875-2 95<105 - 144 105-144 Cognitive psychology 95 2017 0010-0285 http://pub.dzne.de/record/139395/files/DZNE-2020-05717_Restricted.pdf http://pub.dzne.de/record/139395/files/DZNE-2020-05717_Restricted.pdf?subformat=pdfa pdfa VDB oai:pub.dzne.de:139395 Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen I:(DE-588)1065079516 DZNE 0 P:(DE-2719)2811255 Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen I:(DE-588)1065079516 DZNE 3 P:(DE-2719)2810583 DE-HGF Gesundheit Erkrankungen des Nervensystems G:(DE-HGF)POF3-340 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-344 G:(DE-HGF)POF3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-300 G:(DE-HGF)POF Clinical and Health Care Research 0 2017 Nationallizenz StatID:(DE-HGF)0420 StatID 2023-03-30 ger JCR StatID:(DE-HGF)0100 StatID COGNITIVE PSYCHOL : 2021 2023-03-30 DBCoverage StatID:(DE-HGF)0200 StatID SCOPUS 2023-03-30 DBCoverage StatID:(DE-HGF)0300 StatID Medline 2023-03-30 DBCoverage StatID:(DE-HGF)0600 StatID Ebsco Academic Search 2023-03-30 Peer Review StatID:(DE-HGF)0030 StatID ASC 2023-03-30 DBCoverage StatID:(DE-HGF)0199 StatID Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List 2023-03-30 DBCoverage StatID:(DE-HGF)1180 StatID Current Contents - Social and Behavioral Sciences 2023-03-30 DBCoverage StatID:(DE-HGF)0150 StatID Web of Science Core Collection 2023-03-30 DBCoverage StatID:(DE-HGF)0130 StatID Social Sciences Citation Index 2023-03-30 IF < 5 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900 StatID 2023-03-30 I:(DE-2719)1310002 AG Wolbers Aging, Cognition and Technology 0 journal VDB I:(DE-2719)1310002 UNRESTRICTED