<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/dcterms.xsd"><dc:language>eng</dc:language><dc:creator>Obrecht-Sturm, Denise</dc:creator><dc:creator>Schömig, Lena</dc:creator><dc:creator>Kortmann, Rolf-Dieter</dc:creator><dc:creator>Gerber, Nicolas U</dc:creator><dc:creator>von Bueren, André O</dc:creator><dc:creator>Fleischhack, Gudrun</dc:creator><dc:creator>Schüller, Ulrich</dc:creator><dc:creator>Nussbaumer, Gunther</dc:creator><dc:creator>Benesch, Martin</dc:creator><dc:creator>Rutkowski, Stefan</dc:creator><dc:creator>Mynarek, Martin</dc:creator><dc:creator>Bison, Brigitte</dc:creator><dc:creator>Schwarz, Rudolf</dc:creator><dc:creator>Pietsch, Torsten</dc:creator><dc:creator>Pfister, Stefan M</dc:creator><dc:creator>Sill, Martin</dc:creator><dc:creator>Sturm, Dominik</dc:creator><dc:creator>Sahm, Felix</dc:creator><dc:title>Treatment response as surrogate to predict risk for disease progression in pediatric medulloblastoma with persistent magnetic resonance imaging lesions after first-line treatment.</dc:title><dc:subject>info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/610</dc:subject><dc:subject>Humans</dc:subject><dc:subject>Medulloblastoma: diagnostic imaging</dc:subject><dc:subject>Medulloblastoma: pathology</dc:subject><dc:subject>Male</dc:subject><dc:subject>Child</dc:subject><dc:subject>Female</dc:subject><dc:subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging: methods</dc:subject><dc:subject>Cerebellar Neoplasms: diagnostic imaging</dc:subject><dc:subject>Cerebellar Neoplasms: pathology</dc:subject><dc:subject>Disease Progression</dc:subject><dc:subject>Child, Preschool</dc:subject><dc:subject>Adolescent</dc:subject><dc:subject>Follow-Up Studies</dc:subject><dc:subject>Prognosis</dc:subject><dc:subject>Retrospective Studies</dc:subject><dc:subject>Survival Rate</dc:subject><dc:subject>Infant</dc:subject><dc:subject>Neoplasm, Residual: diagnostic imaging</dc:subject><dc:subject>Neoplasm, Residual: pathology</dc:subject><dc:subject>MRI</dc:subject><dc:subject>children</dc:subject><dc:subject>medulloblastoma</dc:subject><dc:subject>persistent residual disease</dc:subject><dc:description>This study aims at clarifying the impact of persistent residual lesions following first-line treatment for pediatric medulloblastoma.Data on 84 pediatric patients with medulloblastoma and persistent residual lesions on centrally reviewed magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at the end of first-line therapy were analyzed.Twenty patients (23.8%) had residual lesions in the tumor bed (R+/M0), 51 (60.7%) had distant lesions (R0/M+) and 13 (15.5%) had both (R+/M+). Overall response to first-line therapy was minor or partial (≥ 25% reduction, minor response [MR]/PR) for 64 (76.2%) and stable disease (SD) for 20 patients (23.8%). Five-year post-primary-treatment progression-free (pptPFS) and overall survival (pptOS) were superior after MR/PR (pptPFS: 62.5 ± 7.0%[MR/PR] vs. 35.9 ± 12.8%[SD], P = .03; pptOS: 79.7 ± 5.9[MR/PR] vs. 55.5 ± 13.9[SD], P = .04). Furthermore, R+/M + was associated with a higher risk for progression (5-year pptPFS: 22.9 ± 17.9%[R+, M+] vs. 72.4 ± 12.0%[R+, M0]; P = .03). Watch-and-wait was pursued in 58 patients, while n = 26 received additional treatments (chemotherapy only, n = 19; surgery only, n = 2; combined, n = 3; valproic acid, n = 2), and their outcomes were not superior to watch-and-wait (5-year pptPFS: 58.5 ± 7.7% vs. 51.6 ± 10.7% P = .71; 5-year pptOS: 76.3 ± 6.9% vs. 69.8 ± 9.7%, P = .74). For the whole cohort, 5-year pptPFS by molecular subgroup (58 cases) were WNT: 100%, SHH: 50.0 ± 35.4%, group-4, 52.5 ± 10.5, group-3 54.2 ± 13.8%; (P = .08).Overall response and extent of lesions can function as surrogate parameters to predict outcomes in pediatric MB patients with persistent lesions after first-line therapy. Especially in the case of solitary persistent medulloblastoma MRI lesions, additional therapy was not beneficial. Therefore, treatment response, extent/kind of residual lesions and further diagnostic information need consideration for indication of additional treatments for persisting lesions.</dc:description><dc:source>Neuro-Oncology 26(9), 1712 - 1722 (2024). doi:10.1093/neuonc/noae071</dc:source><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type><dc:publisher>Oxford Univ. Press</dc:publisher><dc:date>2024</dc:date><dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess</dc:rights><dc:coverage>DE</dc:coverage><dc:identifier>https://pub.dzne.de/record/271966</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>https://pub.dzne.de/search?p=id:%22DZNE-2024-01108%22</dc:identifier><dc:audience>Researchers</dc:audience><dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pmid/pmid:38578306</dc:relation><dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/1522-8517</dc:relation><dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/1523-5866</dc:relation><dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1093/neuonc/noae071</dc:relation></oai_dc:dc>

</collection>