% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Butterbrod:281878,
      author       = {Butterbrod, Elke and Rabin, Laura and Tommet, Douglas and
                      Jones, Richard N. and Dubbelman, Mark A. and Crane, Paul K.
                      and Jessen, Frank and van der Flier, Wiesje M. and Gifford,
                      Katherine A. and Sikkes, Sietske A. M.},
      title        = {{P}erspectives on the measurement of self‐perceived
                      cognitive function in older adults},
      journal      = {Alzheimer's $\&$ dementia / Diagnosis, assessment $\&$
                      disease monitoring},
      volume       = {17},
      number       = {4},
      issn         = {2352-8729},
      address      = {Hoboken, NJ},
      publisher    = {Wiley},
      reportid     = {DZNE-2025-01249},
      pages        = {e70158},
      year         = {2025},
      abstract     = {INTRODUCTION:This survey investigated perspectives of
                      research and clinical professionals on optimal content and
                      features of measurement of self-perceived cognitive
                      functioning.METHODS:Respondents were professionals working
                      with older adults with self-reported cognitive concerns. The
                      survey addressed views on harmonization and preferences for
                      items, response formatting, practical features, and
                      instrument validation. We evaluated item preferences in
                      consideration of a previous statistical
                      harmonization.RESULTS:Ninety professionals from 20 different
                      countries completed the survey. Most professionals $(87\%)$
                      indicated a need for a harmonized instrument. Respondents
                      agreed that an instrument should measure current ability
                      alongside change therein, focus on memory, and adopt Likert
                      scale responses. Recommendations for assessment timeframe,
                      practical features, and validation priorities varied.
                      Respondents differentially endorsed items previously found
                      to be statistically informative.DISCUSSION:Respondents
                      agreed on overarching measurement topics, with varying
                      recommendations for specific content and features. Together
                      with statistical information, these results provide a
                      starting point for a harmonized instrument.},
      cin          = {AG Jessen},
      ddc          = {610},
      cid          = {I:(DE-2719)1011102},
      pnm          = {353 - Clinical and Health Care Research (POF4-353)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-353},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      doi          = {10.1002/dad2.70158},
      url          = {https://pub.dzne.de/record/281878},
}