% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Lutz:137718,
author = {Lutz, Sharon M and Hokanson, John E and Lange, Christoph},
title = {{A}n alternative hypothesis testing strategy for secondary
phenotype data in case-control genetic association studies.},
journal = {Frontiers in genetics},
volume = {5},
issn = {1664-8021},
address = {Lausanne},
publisher = {Frontiers Media},
reportid = {DZNE-2020-04040},
pages = {188},
year = {2014},
abstract = {Motivated by the challenges associated with accounting for
the ascertainment when analyzing secondary phenotypes that
are correlated with case-control status, Lin and Zeng have
proposed a method that properly reflects the case-control
sampling (Lin and Zeng, 2009). The Lin and Zeng method has
the advantage of accurately estimating effect sizes for
secondary phenotypes that are normally distributed or
dichotomous. This method can be computationally intensive in
practice under the null hypothesis when the likelihood
surface that needs to be maximized can be relatively flat.
We propose an extension of the Lin and Zeng method for
hypothesis testing that uses proportional odds logistic
regression to circumvent these computational issues. Through
simulation studies, we compare the power and type-1 error
rate of our method to standard approaches and Lin and Zeng's
approach.},
cin = {U T4 Researchers - Bonn},
ddc = {570},
cid = {I:(DE-2719)7000008},
pnm = {345 - Population Studies and Genetics (POF3-345)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-345},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:25071819},
pmc = {pmc:PMC4076613},
doi = {10.3389/fgene.2014.00188},
url = {https://pub.dzne.de/record/137718},
}