% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{vandeNieuwenhuijzen:138624,
      author       = {van de Nieuwenhuijzen, M. E. and Axmacher, N. and Fell, J.
                      and Oehrn, C. R. and Jensen, O. and van Gerven, M. A. J.},
      title        = {{D}ecoding of task-relevant and task-irrelevant
                      intracranial {EEG} representations.},
      journal      = {NeuroImage},
      volume       = {137},
      issn         = {1053-8119},
      address      = {Orlando, Fla.},
      publisher    = {Academic Press},
      reportid     = {DZNE-2020-04946},
      pages        = {132-139},
      year         = {2016},
      abstract     = {Natural stimuli consist of multiple properties. However,
                      not all of these properties are equally relevant in a given
                      situation. In this study, we applied multivariate
                      classification algorithms to intracranial
                      electroencephalography data of human epilepsy patients
                      performing an auditory Stroop task. This allowed us to
                      identify neuronal representations of task-relevant and
                      irrelevant pitch and semantic information of spoken words in
                      a subset of patients. When properties were relevant,
                      representations could be detected after about 350ms after
                      stimulus onset. When irrelevant, the association with gamma
                      power differed for these properties. Patients with more
                      reliable representations of irrelevant pitch showed
                      increased gamma band activity (35-64Hz), suggesting that
                      attentional resources allow an increase in gamma power in
                      some but not all patients. This effect was not observed for
                      irrelevant semantics, possibly because the more automatic
                      processing of this property allowed for less variation in
                      free resources. Processing of different properties of the
                      same stimulus seems therefore to be dependent on the
                      characteristics of the property.},
      keywords     = {Adult / Attention / Brain: physiopathology / Brain Mapping:
                      methods / Electroencephalography: methods / Epilepsy:
                      physiopathology / Female / Goals / Humans / Male /
                      Reproducibility of Results / Rest: physiology / Sensitivity
                      and Specificity / Speech Perception / Task Performance and
                      Analysis},
      cin          = {AG Axmacher},
      ddc          = {610},
      cid          = {I:(DE-2719)5000027},
      pnm          = {344 - Clinical and Health Care Research (POF3-344)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-344},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      pubmed       = {pmid:27153977},
      doi          = {10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.05.008},
      url          = {https://pub.dzne.de/record/138624},
}