% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Shine:138643,
author = {Shine, Jonathan P and Valdes Herrera, Jose Pedro and
Hegarty, Mary and Wolbers, Thomas},
title = {{T}he {H}uman {R}etrosplenial {C}ortex and {T}halamus
{C}ode {H}ead {D}irection in a {G}lobal {R}eference
{F}rame.},
journal = {The journal of neuroscience},
volume = {36},
number = {24},
issn = {0270-6474},
address = {Washington, DC},
publisher = {Soc.57413},
reportid = {DZNE-2020-04965},
pages = {6371-6381},
year = {2016},
abstract = {Spatial navigation is a multisensory process involving
integration of visual and body-based cues. In rodents, head
direction (HD) cells, which are most abundant in the
thalamus, integrate these cues to code facing direction.
Human fMRI studies examining HD coding in virtual
environments (VE) have reported effects in retrosplenial
complex and (pre-)subiculum, but not the thalamus.
Furthermore, HD coding appeared insensitive to global
landmarks. These tasks, however, provided only visual cues
for orientation, and attending to global landmarks did not
benefit task performance. In the present study, participants
explored a VE comprising four separate locales, surrounded
by four global landmarks. To provide body-based cues,
participants wore a head-mounted display so that physical
rotations changed facing direction in the VE. During
subsequent MRI scanning, subjects saw stationary views of
the environment and judged whether their orientation was the
same as in the preceding trial. Parameter estimates
extracted from retrosplenial cortex and the thalamus
revealed significantly reduced BOLD responses when HD was
repeated. Moreover, consistent with rodent findings, the
signal did not continue to adapt over repetitions of the
same HD. These results were supported by a whole-brain
analysis showing additional repetition suppression in the
precuneus. Together, our findings suggest that: (1)
consistent with the rodent literature, the human thalamus
may integrate visual and body-based, orientation cues; (2)
global reference frame cues can be used to integrate HD
across separate individual locales; and (3) immersive
training procedures providing full body-based cues may help
to elucidate the neural mechanisms supporting spatial
navigation.In rodents, head direction (HD) cells signal
facing direction in the environment via increased firing
when the animal assumes a certain orientation. Distinct
brain regions, the retrosplenial cortex (RSC) and thalamus,
code for visual and vestibular cues of orientation,
respectively. Putative HD signals have been observed in
human RSC but not the thalamus, potentially because
body-based cues were not provided. Here, participants
encoded HD in a novel virtual environment while wearing a
head-mounted display to provide body-based cues for
orientation. In subsequent fMRI scanning, we found evidence
of an HD signal in RSC, thalamus, and precuneus. These
findings harmonize rodent and human data, and suggest that
immersive training procedures provide a viable way to
examine the neural basis of navigation.},
keywords = {Adult / Analysis of Variance / Cerebral Cortex: diagnostic
imaging / Cerebral Cortex: physiology / Cues / Female / Head
Movements: physiology / Humans / Image Processing,
Computer-Assisted / Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Male /
Orientation: physiology / Oxygen: blood / Photic Stimulation
/ Reaction Time / Spatial Navigation: physiology / Thalamus:
diagnostic imaging / Thalamus: physiology / User-Computer
Interface / Young Adult / Oxygen (NLM Chemicals)},
cin = {AG Wolbers},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-2719)1310002},
pnm = {344 - Clinical and Health Care Research (POF3-344)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-344},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:27307227},
pmc = {pmc:PMC5321500},
doi = {10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1268-15.2016},
url = {https://pub.dzne.de/record/138643},
}