% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Hhne:138710,
author = {Höhne, Marlene and Jahanbekam, Amirhossein and Bauckhage,
Christian and Axmacher, Nikolai and Fell, Juergen},
title = {{P}rediction of successful memory encoding based on
single-trial rhinal and hippocampal phase information.},
journal = {NeuroImage},
volume = {139},
issn = {1053-8119},
address = {Orlando, Fla.},
publisher = {Academic Press},
reportid = {DZNE-2020-05032},
pages = {127-135},
year = {2016},
abstract = {Mediotemporal EEG characteristics are closely related to
long-term memory formation. It has been reported that rhinal
and hippocampal EEG measures reflecting the stability of
phases across trials are better suited to distinguish
subsequently remembered from forgotten trials than
event-related potentials or amplitude-based measures.
Theoretical models suggest that the phase of EEG
oscillations reflects neural excitability and influences
cellular plasticity. However, while previous studies have
shown that the stability of phase values across trials is
indeed a relevant predictor of subsequent memory
performance, the effect of absolute single-trial phase
values has been little explored. Here, we reanalyzed
intracranial EEG recordings from the mediotemporal lobe of
27 epilepsy patients performing a continuous word
recognition paradigm. Two-class classification using a
support vector machine was performed to predict subsequently
remembered vs. forgotten trials based on individually
selected frequencies and time points. We demonstrate that it
is possible to successfully predict single-trial memory
formation in the majority of patients (23 out of 27) based
on only three single-trial phase values given by a rhinal
phase, a hippocampal phase, and a rhinal-hippocampal phase
difference. Overall classification accuracy across all
subjects was $69.2\%$ choosing frequencies from the range
between 0.5 and 50Hz and time points from the interval
between -0.5s and 2s. For 19 patients, above chance
prediction of subsequent memory was possible even when
choosing only time points from the prestimulus interval
(overall accuracy: $65.2\%).$ Furthermore, prediction
accuracies based on single-trial phase surpassed those based
on single-trial power. Our results confirm the functional
relevance of mediotemporal EEG phase for long-term memory
operations and suggest that phase information may be
utilized for memory enhancement applications based on deep
brain stimulation.},
keywords = {Adolescent / Adult / Brain Mapping: methods / Computer
Simulation / Cortical Synchronization: physiology /
Electroencephalography: methods / Entorhinal Cortex:
physiology / Female / Hippocampus: physiology / Humans /
Male / Memory: physiology / Mental Recall: physiology /
Middle Aged / Models, Neurological / Nerve Net: physiology /
Reproducibility of Results / Sensitivity and Specificity /
Task Performance and Analysis / Young Adult},
cin = {AG Axmacher},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-2719)5000027},
pnm = {344 - Clinical and Health Care Research (POF3-344)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-344},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:27311642},
doi = {10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.06.021},
url = {https://pub.dzne.de/record/138710},
}