% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Knig:139000,
author = {König, Sabine U and Schumann, Frank and Keyser, Johannes
and Goeke, Caspar and Krause, Carina and Wache, Susan and
Lytochkin, Aleksey and Ebert, Manuel and Brunsch, Vincent
and Wahn, Basil and Kaspar, Kai and Nagel, Saskia K and
Meilinger, Tobias and Bülthoff, Heinrich and Wolbers,
Thomas and Büchel, Christian and König, Peter},
title = {{L}earning {N}ew {S}ensorimotor {C}ontingencies: {E}ffects
of {L}ong-{T}erm {U}se of {S}ensory {A}ugmentation on the
{B}rain and {C}onscious {P}erception.},
journal = {PLOS ONE},
volume = {11},
number = {12},
issn = {1932-6203},
address = {San Francisco, California, US},
publisher = {PLOS},
reportid = {DZNE-2020-05322},
pages = {e0166647},
year = {2016},
abstract = {Theories of embodied cognition propose that perception is
shaped by sensory stimuli and by the actions of the
organism. Following sensorimotor contingency theory, the
mastery of lawful relations between own behavior and
resulting changes in sensory signals, called sensorimotor
contingencies, is constitutive of conscious perception.
Sensorimotor contingency theory predicts that, after
training, knowledge relating to new sensorimotor
contingencies develops, leading to changes in the activation
of sensorimotor systems, and concomitant changes in
perception. In the present study, we spell out this
hypothesis in detail and investigate whether it is possible
to learn new sensorimotor contingencies by sensory
augmentation. Specifically, we designed an fMRI compatible
sensory augmentation device, the feelSpace belt, which gives
orientation information about the direction of magnetic
north via vibrotactile stimulation on the waist of
participants. In a longitudinal study, participants trained
with this belt for seven weeks in natural environment. Our
EEG results indicate that training with the belt leads to
changes in sleep architecture early in the training phase,
compatible with the consolidation of procedural learning as
well as increased sensorimotor processing and motor
programming. The fMRI results suggest that training entails
activity in sensory as well as higher motor centers and
brain areas known to be involved in navigation. These neural
changes are accompanied with changes in how space and the
belt signal are perceived, as well as with increased trust
in navigational ability. Thus, our data on physiological
processes and subjective experiences are compatible with the
hypothesis that new sensorimotor contingencies can be
acquired using sensory augmentation.},
keywords = {Adult / Cognition / Consciousness / Female / Humans /
Learning / Magnetic Resonance Imaging: instrumentation /
Magnetic Resonance Imaging: methods / Male / Sensorimotor
Cortex: physiology / Sleep / Space Perception},
cin = {AG Wolbers},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-2719)1310002},
pnm = {344 - Clinical and Health Care Research (POF3-344)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-344},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:27959914},
pmc = {pmc:PMC5154504},
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0166647},
url = {https://pub.dzne.de/record/139000},
}