000139395 001__ 139395
000139395 005__ 20240321220618.0
000139395 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.04.003
000139395 0247_ $$2pmid$$apmid:28478330
000139395 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0010-0285
000139395 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1095-5623
000139395 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:19872489
000139395 037__ $$aDZNE-2020-05717
000139395 041__ $$aEnglish
000139395 082__ $$a150
000139395 1001_ $$0P:(DE-2719)2811255$$aChen, Xiaoli$$b0$$eFirst author$$udzne
000139395 245__ $$aCue combination in human spatial navigation.
000139395 260__ $$aAmsterdam$$bElsevier$$c2017
000139395 264_1 $$2Crossref$$3print$$bElsevier BV$$c2017-06-01
000139395 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000139395 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000139395 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1710344351_30570
000139395 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000139395 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000139395 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000139395 520__ $$aThis project investigated the ways in which visual cues and bodily cues from self-motion are combined in spatial navigation. Participants completed a homing task in an immersive virtual environment. In Experiments 1A and 1B, the reliability of visual cues and self-motion cues was manipulated independently and within-participants. Results showed that participants weighted visual cues and self-motion cues based on their relative reliability and integrated these two cue types optimally or near-optimally according to Bayesian principles under most conditions. In Experiment 2, the stability of visual cues was manipulated across trials. Results indicated that cue instability affected cue weights indirectly by influencing cue reliability. Experiment 3 was designed to mislead participants about cue reliability by providing distorted feedback on the accuracy of their performance. Participants received feedback that their performance with visual cues was better and that their performance with self-motion cues was worse than it actually was or received the inverse feedback. Positive feedback on the accuracy of performance with a given cue improved the relative precision of performance with that cue. Bayesian principles still held for the most part. Experiment 4 examined the relations among the variability of performance, rated confidence in performance, cue weights, and spatial abilities. Participants took part in the homing task over two days and rated confidence in their performance after every trial. Cue relative confidence and cue relative reliability had unique contributions to observed cue weights. The variability of performance was less stable than rated confidence over time. Participants with higher mental rotation scores performed relatively better with self-motion cues than visual cues. Across all four experiments, consistent correlations were found between observed weights assigned to cues and relative reliability of cues, demonstrating that the cue-weighting process followed Bayesian principles. Results also pointed to the important role of subjective evaluation of performance in the cue-weighting process and led to a new conceptualization of cue reliability in human spatial navigation.
000139395 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-344$$a344 - Clinical and Health Care Research (POF3-344)$$cPOF3-344$$fPOF III$$x0
000139395 542__ $$2Crossref$$i2017-06-01$$uhttps://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/
000139395 542__ $$2Crossref$$i2018-05-04$$uhttp://www.elsevier.com/open-access/userlicense/1.0/
000139395 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed,
000139395 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aAdult
000139395 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aCues
000139395 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aFeedback, Psychological: physiology
000139395 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aHumans
000139395 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aPsychomotor Performance: physiology
000139395 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aSpatial Navigation: physiology
000139395 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aYoung Adult
000139395 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aMcNamara, Timothy P$$b1
000139395 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aKelly, Jonathan W$$b2
000139395 7001_ $$0P:(DE-2719)2810583$$aWolbers, Thomas$$b3$$eLast author$$udzne
000139395 77318 $$2Crossref$$3journal-article$$a10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.04.003$$b : Elsevier BV, 2017-06-01$$p105-144$$tCognitive Psychology$$v95$$x0010-0285$$y2017
000139395 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)1462875-2$$a10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.04.003$$gVol. 95, p. 105 - 144$$p105-144$$q95<105 - 144$$tCognitive psychology$$v95$$x0010-0285$$y2017
000139395 8564_ $$uhttps://pub.dzne.de/record/139395/files/DZNE-2020-05717_Restricted.pdf
000139395 8564_ $$uhttps://pub.dzne.de/record/139395/files/DZNE-2020-05717_Restricted.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa
000139395 909CO $$ooai:pub.dzne.de:139395$$pVDB
000139395 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588)1065079516$$6P:(DE-2719)2811255$$aDeutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen$$b0$$kDZNE
000139395 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588)1065079516$$6P:(DE-2719)2810583$$aDeutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen$$b3$$kDZNE
000139395 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-344$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-340$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-300$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bGesundheit$$lErkrankungen des Nervensystems$$vClinical and Health Care Research$$x0
000139395 9141_ $$y2017
000139395 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0420$$2StatID$$aNationallizenz$$d2023-03-30$$wger
000139395 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bCOGNITIVE PSYCHOL : 2021$$d2023-03-30
000139395 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS$$d2023-03-30
000139395 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline$$d2023-03-30
000139395 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0600$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEbsco Academic Search$$d2023-03-30
000139395 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bASC$$d2023-03-30
000139395 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List$$d2023-03-30
000139395 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1180$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Social and Behavioral Sciences$$d2023-03-30
000139395 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection$$d2023-03-30
000139395 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0130$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSocial Sciences Citation Index$$d2023-03-30
000139395 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5$$d2023-03-30
000139395 9201_ $$0I:(DE-2719)1310002$$kAG Wolbers$$lAging, Cognition and Technology$$x0
000139395 980__ $$ajournal
000139395 980__ $$aVDB
000139395 980__ $$aI:(DE-2719)1310002
000139395 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED