% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Herold:140132,
      author       = {Herold, Fabian and Hamacher, Dennis and Schega, Lutz and
                      Müller, Notger G},
      title        = {{T}hinking {W}hile {M}oving or {M}oving {W}hile {T}hinking
                      - {C}oncepts of {M}otor-{C}ognitive {T}raining for
                      {C}ognitive {P}erformance {E}nhancement.},
      journal      = {Frontiers in aging neuroscience},
      volume       = {10},
      issn         = {1663-4365},
      address      = {Lausanne},
      publisher    = {Frontiers Research Foundation},
      reportid     = {DZNE-2020-06454},
      pages        = {228},
      year         = {2018},
      abstract     = {The demographic change in industrial countries, with
                      increasingly sedentary lifestyles, has a negative impact on
                      mental health. Normal and pathological aging leads to
                      cognitive deficits. This development poses major challenges
                      on national health systems. Therefore, it is necessary to
                      develop efficient cognitive enhancement strategies. The
                      combination of regular physical exercise with cognitive
                      stimulation seems especially suited to increase an
                      individual's cognitive reserve, i.e., his/her resistance to
                      degenerative processes of the brain. Here, we outline
                      insufficiently explored fields in exercise-cognition
                      research and provide a classification approach for different
                      motor-cognitive training regimens. We suggest to classify
                      motor-cognitive training in two categories, (I) sequential
                      motor-cognitive training (the motor and cognitive training
                      are conducted time separated) and (II) simultaneous
                      motor-cognitive training (motor and cognitive training are
                      conducted sequentially). In addition, simultaneous
                      motor-cognitive training may be distinguished based on the
                      specific characteristics of the cognitive task. If
                      successfully solving the cognitive task is not a relevant
                      prerequisite to complete the motor-cognitive task, we would
                      consider this type of training as (IIa) motor-cognitive
                      training with additional cognitive task. In contrast, in
                      ecologically more valid (IIb) motor cognitive training with
                      incorporated cognitive task, the cognitive tasks are a
                      relevant prerequisite to solve the motor-cognitive task. We
                      speculate that incorporating cognitive tasks into motor
                      tasks, rather than separate training of mental and physical
                      functions, is the most promising approach to efficiently
                      enhance cognitive reserve. Further research investigating
                      the influence of motor(-cognitive) exercises with different
                      quantitative and qualitative characteristics on cognitive
                      performance is urgently needed.},
      cin          = {AG Müller},
      ddc          = {610},
      cid          = {I:(DE-2719)1310003},
      pnm          = {344 - Clinical and Health Care Research (POF3-344)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-344},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      pubmed       = {pmid:30127732},
      pmc          = {pmc:PMC6089337},
      doi          = {10.3389/fnagi.2018.00228},
      url          = {https://pub.dzne.de/record/140132},
}