% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Hilal:140367,
author = {Hilal, Saima and Tan, Chuen Seng and Adams, Hieab H H and
Habes, Mohamad and Mok, Vincent and Venketasubramanian,
Narayanaswamy and Hofer, Edith and Ikram, M Kamran and
Abrigo, Jill and Vernooij, Meike W and Chen, Christopher and
Hosten, Norbert and Volzke, Henry and Grabe, Hans J and
Schmidt, Reinhold and Ikram, M Arfan},
title = {{E}nlarged perivascular spaces and cognition: {A}
meta-analysis of 5 population-based studies.},
journal = {Neurology},
volume = {91},
number = {9},
issn = {0028-3878},
address = {[S.l.]},
publisher = {Ovid},
reportid = {DZNE-2020-06689},
pages = {e832-e842},
year = {2018},
abstract = {To investigate the association of enlarged perivascular
spaces (ePVS) with cognition in elderly without dementia.We
included 5 studies from the Uniform Neuro-Imaging of
Virchow-Robin Space Enlargement (UNIVRSE) consortium, namely
the Austrian Stroke Prevention Family Study, Study of Health
in Pomerania, Rotterdam Study, Epidemiology of Dementia in
Singapore study, and Risk Index for Subclinical Brain
Lesions in Hong Kong study. ePVS were counted in 4 regions
(mesencephalon, hippocampus, basal ganglia, and centrum
semiovale) with harmonized rating across studies.
Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and general fluid
cognitive ability factor (G-factor) were used to assess
cognitive function. For each study, a linear regression
model was performed to estimate the effect of ePVS on MMSE
and G-factor. Estimates were pooled across studies with the
use of inverse variance meta-analysis with fixed- or
random-effect models when appropriate.The final sample size
consisted of 3,575 persons (age range 63.4-73.2 years,
$50.6\%$ women). Total ePVS counts were not significantly
associated with MMSE score (mean difference per ePVS score
increase 0.001, $95\%$ confidence interval [CI] -0.007 to
0.008, p = 0.885) or G-factor (mean difference per ePVS
score increase 0.002, $95\%$ CI -0.001 to 0.006, p = 0.148)
in age-, sex-, and education-adjusted models. Adjustments
for cardiovascular risk factors and MRI markers did not
change the results. Repeating the analyses with
region-specific ePVS rendered similar results.In this study,
we found that ePVS counts were not associated with cognitive
dysfunction in the general population. Future studies with
longitudinal designs are warranted to examine whether ePVS
contribute to cognitive decline.},
keywords = {Aged / Brain Edema: complications / Brain Edema: diagnostic
imaging / Cerebral Arteries: pathology / Cognition
Disorders: diagnostic imaging / Cognition Disorders:
etiology / Community Health Planning / Female / Humans /
Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Male / Middle Aged /
Neuropsychological Tests},
cin = {Rostock / Greifswald Pre 2020},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-2719)6000017},
pnm = {344 - Clinical and Health Care Research (POF3-344)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-344},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:30068634},
pmc = {pmc:PMC6133622},
doi = {10.1212/WNL.0000000000006079},
url = {https://pub.dzne.de/record/140367},
}