000140764 001__ 140764
000140764 005__ 20240321220854.0
000140764 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1016/j.bbr.2019.111929
000140764 0247_ $$2pmid$$apmid:31047923
000140764 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0166-4328
000140764 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1872-7549
000140764 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:59925575
000140764 037__ $$aDZNE-2020-07086
000140764 041__ $$aEnglish
000140764 082__ $$a610
000140764 1001_ $$0P:(DE-2719)2813753$$aRiemer, Martin$$b0$$eFirst author$$udzne
000140764 245__ $$aThe effect of feedback on temporal error monitoring and timing behavior.
000140764 260__ $$aAmsterdam$$bElsevier$$c2019
000140764 264_1 $$2Crossref$$3print$$bElsevier BV$$c2019-09-01
000140764 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000140764 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000140764 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1709908711_26558
000140764 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000140764 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000140764 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000140764 520__ $$aMetacognitive processes in human timing behavior are rarely investigated, which stands in sharp contrast to the wide research field of metacognition itself. To date, little is known about the sources and the reliability of information that humans possess to judge their own timing abilities and to monitor errors in time-keeping. Here, we intended to fill this gap by determining the degree to which humans depend on external feedback to adjust their timing behavior and make metacognitive accuracy judgments. Two groups of participants performed a time reproduction task under different feedback conditions. After each trial, participants were informed either about the magnitude and the direction of their timing error (signed feedback group) or about its magnitude alone (absolute feedback group). Reproduction errors were related to retrospective, metacognitive judgments on the overall timing performance. The results indicate that the under reproduction effect occurred, rather independently of the type of feedback; however, signed feedback was essential to reduce the bias in metacognitive judgments on timing accuracy. Without being explicitly informed about the direction of timing errors (whether the reproduction interval was stopped too early or too late), participants significantly overestimated their reproduced durations. These results extend previous reports of metacognitive processes in timing behavior measured on a single-trial basis, and provide new insights into the ability of temporal error monitoring in humans.
000140764 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-344$$a344 - Clinical and Health Care Research (POF3-344)$$cPOF3-344$$fPOF III$$x0
000140764 542__ $$2Crossref$$i2019-09-01$$uhttps://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/
000140764 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed,
000140764 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aAdult
000140764 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aFeedback
000140764 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aFemale
000140764 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aHealthy Volunteers
000140764 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aHumans
000140764 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aJudgment
000140764 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aKnowledge of Results, Psychological
000140764 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aMale
000140764 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aMetacognition: physiology
000140764 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aReproducibility of Results
000140764 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aRetrospective Studies
000140764 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aTime
000140764 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aTime Perception: physiology
000140764 7001_ $$aKubik, Veit$$b1
000140764 7001_ $$0P:(DE-2719)2810583$$aWolbers, Thomas$$b2$$eLast author$$udzne
000140764 77318 $$2Crossref$$3journal-article$$a10.1016/j.bbr.2019.111929$$b : Elsevier BV, 2019-09-01$$p111929$$tBehavioural Brain Research$$v369$$x0166-4328$$y2019
000140764 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2013604-3$$a10.1016/j.bbr.2019.111929$$gVol. 369, p. 111929 -$$p111929$$q369<111929 -$$tBehavioural brain research$$v369$$x0166-4328$$y2019
000140764 8564_ $$uhttps://pub.dzne.de/record/140764/files/DZNE-2020-07086_Restricted.pdf
000140764 8564_ $$uhttps://pub.dzne.de/record/140764/files/DZNE-2020-07086_Restricted.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa
000140764 909CO $$ooai:pub.dzne.de:140764$$pVDB
000140764 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588)1065079516$$6P:(DE-2719)2813753$$aDeutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen$$b0$$kDZNE
000140764 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588)1065079516$$6P:(DE-2719)2810583$$aDeutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen$$b2$$kDZNE
000140764 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-344$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-340$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-300$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bGesundheit$$lErkrankungen des Nervensystems$$vClinical and Health Care Research$$x0
000140764 9141_ $$y2019
000140764 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0420$$2StatID$$aNationallizenz$$d2022-11-17$$wger
000140764 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bBEHAV BRAIN RES : 2021$$d2022-11-17
000140764 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS$$d2022-11-17
000140764 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline$$d2022-11-17
000140764 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0600$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEbsco Academic Search$$d2022-11-17
000140764 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bASC$$d2022-11-17
000140764 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List$$d2022-11-17
000140764 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection$$d2022-11-17
000140764 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews$$d2022-11-17
000140764 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1030$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Life Sciences$$d2022-11-17
000140764 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5$$d2022-11-17
000140764 9201_ $$0I:(DE-2719)1310002$$kAG Wolbers$$lAging, Cognition and Technology$$x0
000140764 980__ $$ajournal
000140764 980__ $$aVDB
000140764 980__ $$aI:(DE-2719)1310002
000140764 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED