Home > Publications Database > The effect of feedback on temporal error monitoring and timing behavior. > print

001     140764
005     20240321220854.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1016/j.bbr.2019.111929
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a pmid:31047923
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a 0166-4328
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1872-7549
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a altmetric:59925575
|2 altmetric
037 _ _ |a DZNE-2020-07086
041 _ _ |a English
082 _ _ |a 610
100 1 _ |a Riemer, Martin
|0 P:(DE-2719)2813753
|b 0
|e First author
|u dzne
245 _ _ |a The effect of feedback on temporal error monitoring and timing behavior.
260 _ _ |a Amsterdam
|c 2019
|b Elsevier
264 _ 1 |3 print
|2 Crossref
|b Elsevier BV
|c 2019-09-01
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1709908711_26558
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Metacognitive processes in human timing behavior are rarely investigated, which stands in sharp contrast to the wide research field of metacognition itself. To date, little is known about the sources and the reliability of information that humans possess to judge their own timing abilities and to monitor errors in time-keeping. Here, we intended to fill this gap by determining the degree to which humans depend on external feedback to adjust their timing behavior and make metacognitive accuracy judgments. Two groups of participants performed a time reproduction task under different feedback conditions. After each trial, participants were informed either about the magnitude and the direction of their timing error (signed feedback group) or about its magnitude alone (absolute feedback group). Reproduction errors were related to retrospective, metacognitive judgments on the overall timing performance. The results indicate that the under reproduction effect occurred, rather independently of the type of feedback; however, signed feedback was essential to reduce the bias in metacognitive judgments on timing accuracy. Without being explicitly informed about the direction of timing errors (whether the reproduction interval was stopped too early or too late), participants significantly overestimated their reproduced durations. These results extend previous reports of metacognitive processes in timing behavior measured on a single-trial basis, and provide new insights into the ability of temporal error monitoring in humans.
536 _ _ |a 344 - Clinical and Health Care Research (POF3-344)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-344
|c POF3-344
|f POF III
|x 0
542 _ _ |i 2019-09-01
|2 Crossref
|u https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed,
650 _ 2 |a Adult
|2 MeSH
650 _ 2 |a Feedback
|2 MeSH
650 _ 2 |a Female
|2 MeSH
650 _ 2 |a Healthy Volunteers
|2 MeSH
650 _ 2 |a Humans
|2 MeSH
650 _ 2 |a Judgment
|2 MeSH
650 _ 2 |a Knowledge of Results, Psychological
|2 MeSH
650 _ 2 |a Male
|2 MeSH
650 _ 2 |a Metacognition: physiology
|2 MeSH
650 _ 2 |a Reproducibility of Results
|2 MeSH
650 _ 2 |a Retrospective Studies
|2 MeSH
650 _ 2 |a Time
|2 MeSH
650 _ 2 |a Time Perception: physiology
|2 MeSH
700 1 _ |a Kubik, Veit
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Wolbers, Thomas
|0 P:(DE-2719)2810583
|b 2
|e Last author
|u dzne
773 1 8 |a 10.1016/j.bbr.2019.111929
|b : Elsevier BV, 2019-09-01
|p 111929
|3 journal-article
|2 Crossref
|t Behavioural Brain Research
|v 369
|y 2019
|x 0166-4328
773 _ _ |a 10.1016/j.bbr.2019.111929
|g Vol. 369, p. 111929 -
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2013604-3
|q 369<111929 -
|p 111929
|t Behavioural brain research
|v 369
|y 2019
|x 0166-4328
856 4 _ |u https://pub.dzne.de/record/140764/files/DZNE-2020-07086_Restricted.pdf
856 4 _ |u https://pub.dzne.de/record/140764/files/DZNE-2020-07086_Restricted.pdf?subformat=pdfa
|x pdfa
909 C O |p VDB
|o oai:pub.dzne.de:140764
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen
|0 I:(DE-588)1065079516
|k DZNE
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-2719)2813753
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen
|0 I:(DE-588)1065079516
|k DZNE
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-2719)2810583
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Gesundheit
|l Erkrankungen des Nervensystems
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-340
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-344
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-300
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Clinical and Health Care Research
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2019
915 _ _ |a Nationallizenz
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420
|2 StatID
|d 2022-11-17
|w ger
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b BEHAV BRAIN RES : 2021
|d 2022-11-17
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2022-11-17
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2022-11-17
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
|d 2022-11-17
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
|d 2022-11-17
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2022-11-17
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2022-11-17
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
|d 2022-11-17
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1030
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Life Sciences
|d 2022-11-17
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
|d 2022-11-17
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-2719)1310002
|k AG Wolbers
|l Aging, Cognition and Technology
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-2719)1310002
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED

LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21