% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Kuske:141209,
      author       = {Kuske, Silke and Graf, Rabea and Hartig, Marie and
                      Quasdorf, Tina and Vollmar, Horst Christian and
                      Bartholomeyczik, Sabine},
      title        = {{D}ementia considered? {S}afety-relevant communication
                      between health care settings: a systematic review},
      journal      = {Journal of public health},
      volume       = {22},
      number       = {5},
      issn         = {2198-1833},
      address      = {Heidelberg},
      publisher    = {Springer},
      reportid     = {DZNE-2020-07531},
      pages        = {383-393},
      year         = {2014},
      abstract     = {To identify literature on safety-relevant handover
                      communication, as operationalized by an adapted Lasswell
                      communication model, and to reveal the extent to which this
                      literature is relevant to patients with dementia (PwD).
                      Furthermore, the study identifies interventions that could
                      be applicable in dementia handover communication.MethodsA
                      systematic review was performed. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane
                      Library, CINAHL, PsycInfo and GeroLit were searched for
                      publications indexed up to and including April 2011. Forward
                      citation tracking was conducted in January 2012 using the
                      SCOPUS database. The inclusion criteria followed an adapted
                      Lasswell communication model. Evidence was excluded that did
                      not meet more than three-quarters of the critical
                      appraisal’s 27 quality criteria. A content analysis and a
                      critical appraisal were performed to eliminate ineligible
                      publications.ResultsOut of 3,918 positive search results, a
                      total of 5 publications were ultimately eligible for
                      inclusion. Only one of them included PwD in the intervention
                      group. However, since dementia was not the focus of the
                      study, the paper contained no discussion of the results
                      specifically for PwD.ConclusionThere are several options for
                      improving safety-relevant handover communication between
                      settings, but strong evidence is still lacking, particularly
                      for PwD. Research involving PwD should include topics such
                      as the role of advanced nurse practitioners (APN), the
                      information needs of everyone involved in the handover and
                      appropriate involvement of informal caregivers.
                      Responsibilities in care should be defined and specific
                      communication processes implemented. Further investigation
                      and application of Naylor et al.’s (2007) transitional
                      care model could be particularly helpful in dementia
                      research.},
      subtyp        = {Review Article},
      cin          = {AG Roes / AG Halek / Witten common},
      ddc          = {610},
      cid          = {I:(DE-2719)1610003 / I:(DE-2719)1610001 /
                      I:(DE-2719)6000020},
      pnm          = {344 - Clinical and Health Care Research (POF3-344)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-344},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      doi          = {10.1007/s10389-014-0630-y},
      url          = {https://pub.dzne.de/record/141209},
}