% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Neumann:141562,
      author       = {Neumann, Thomas and Baum, Anne Katrin and Baum, Ulrike and
                      Deike, Renate and Feistner, Helmut and Scholz, Michael and
                      Hinrichs, Hermann and Robra, Bernt-Peter},
      title        = {{A}ssessment of the technical usability and efficacy of a
                      new portable dry-electrode {EEG} recorder: {F}irst results
                      of the {HOMEONE} study.},
      journal      = {Clinical neurophysiology},
      volume       = {130},
      number       = {11},
      issn         = {1388-2457},
      address      = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Elsevier Science},
      reportid     = {DZNE-2020-07886},
      pages        = {2076-2087},
      year         = {2019},
      abstract     = {The HOME project is intended to provide evidence of
                      diagnostic and therapeutic yield of a patient-controlled EEG
                      home-monitoring for neurological outpatients.This study
                      evaluated the technical and practical usability and efficacy
                      of a new portable dry-electrode EEG recorder in comparison
                      to conventional EEG devices based on technical assessments
                      and inter-rater comparisons of EEG record examinations of
                      office-based practitioners and two experienced
                      neurologists.The technical assessment was based on
                      channel-wise comparisons of band power values derived from
                      power spectra as observed in two recording modalities.
                      Slight yet significant differences were observed only in the
                      Delta-frequency band (1.5-4 Hz). The fraction of
                      automatically detected artifact segments was larger in the
                      new portable recordings than in conventional recordings
                      $(20\%$ vs. $11\%,$ median). Overall, $93\%$ of raters'
                      stated diagnostic findings gathered from conventional
                      devices were concordant with stated diagnostic findings
                      gathered from the new portable device.The new EEG device was
                      shown to have technical comparability to and a high
                      concordance rate of diagnostic findings with conventional
                      EEG devices.The new portable dry-electrode EEG device is
                      suitable to meet the HOME projects' goal of establishing a
                      patient-controlled EEG home-monitoring in the routine care
                      of neurological outpatients.DRKS DRKS00012685. Registered 09
                      August 2017, retrospectively registered.},
      keywords     = {Brain: physiopathology / Electroencephalography:
                      instrumentation / Electroencephalography: methods / Humans /
                      Monitoring, Physiologic / Nervous System Diseases:
                      physiopathology / Self-Management},
      cin          = {U Clinical Researchers - Magdeburg},
      ddc          = {610},
      cid          = {I:(DE-2719)7000000},
      pnm          = {344 - Clinical and Health Care Research (POF3-344)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-344},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      pubmed       = {pmid:31541985},
      doi          = {10.1016/j.clinph.2019.08.012},
      url          = {https://pub.dzne.de/record/141562},
}