% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Law:141583,
      author       = {Law, Ernest H and Jiang, Ruixuan and Rädke, Anika and
                      Mühlbacher, Axel and Pickard, A Simon},
      title        = {{T}he {R}ole of {P}ersonality in {T}reatment-{R}elated
                      {O}utcome {P}references {A}mong {P}harmacy {S}tudents.},
      journal      = {American journal of pharmaceutical education},
      volume       = {83},
      number       = {7},
      issn         = {0002-9459},
      address      = {Des Moines, Iowa},
      publisher    = {Assoc.},
      reportid     = {DZNE-2020-07907},
      pages        = {6891},
      year         = {2019},
      abstract     = {Objective. To examine whether personality traits,
                      particularly conscientiousness and agreeableness, were
                      associated with systematic differences in health outcome
                      preferences in cancer treatment scenarios among second-year
                      Doctor of Pharmacy students. Methods. An online survey that
                      quantified outcome preferences using profile best-worst
                      scaling tasks was administered to pharmacy students (n=185).
                      The Big Five personality inventory was used to categorize
                      respondents into tertile-based levels of each trait.
                      Treatment-related health outcomes were described using the
                      EQ-5D-Y system and framed with hypothetical cancer treatment
                      scenarios. Preferences were obtained using count analysis
                      for each treatment-related outcome, and differences based on
                      the level of trait were tested using analysis of variance.
                      Logistic regression was used to test for significant
                      associations between higher levels of a trait and choosing
                      dead over a severe health state. Results. Higher
                      conscientiousness was associated with students who had an
                      approximately $20\%$ more positive preference for 'no
                      problems' in the Usual Activities and Pain/Discomfort
                      attributes, as well as a $19\%$ more negative preference for
                      'a lot of problems' in the Pain/Discomfort attribute. No
                      differences in treatment preferences were observed across
                      agreeableness tertiles. Higher levels of personality traits
                      were not significantly associated with choosing death over
                      being in moderate health. Conclusion. Conscientiousness
                      appears to be a factor in treatment-related outcome
                      preferences among pharmacy students. Individuals with higher
                      levels of conscientiousness may be more likely to recommend
                      treatments that are less likely to cause pain or discomfort
                      and negatively impact a patient's usual activities.},
      keywords     = {Adult / Education, Pharmacy / Female / Humans / Male /
                      Neoplasms: therapy / Patient Preference / Personality /
                      Students, Pharmacy: psychology / Surveys and Questionnaires
                      / Treatment Outcome / Young Adult},
      cin          = {AG Grabe},
      ddc          = {610},
      cid          = {I:(DE-2719)5000001},
      pnm          = {344 - Clinical and Health Care Research (POF3-344)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-344},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      pubmed       = {pmid:31619813},
      pmc          = {pmc:PMC6788147},
      doi          = {10.5688/ajpe6891},
      url          = {https://pub.dzne.de/record/141583},
}