% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Herm:144990,
author = {Herm, Juliane and Schirdewan, Alexander and Koch, Lydia and
Wutzler, Alexander and Fiebach, Jochen B and Endres,
Matthias and Kopp, Ute A and Haeusler, Karl Georg},
title = {{I}mpact of atrial fibrillation burden on cognitive
function after left atrial ablation - {R}esults of the
{MACPAF} study.},
journal = {Journal of clinical neuroscience},
volume = {73},
issn = {0967-5868},
address = {Burlington, Mass.},
publisher = {Harcourt},
reportid = {DZNE-2020-00354},
pages = {168-172},
year = {2020},
abstract = {Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with cognitive
decline and dementia irrespective of AF-related ischemic
stroke. We investigated whether AF burden after ablation in
patients with symptomatic paroxysmal AF has an impact on
cognitive function. After enrolment to the prospective
MACPAF study, study patients received an insertable loop
recorder (ILR) and underwent serial neurological/cognitive
assessment. To compare cognitive function, the delta of
baseline and six months test results (Δpre/post) and a
score to assess overall cognitive performance were computed.
Thirty patients (median age 65 years (IQR 57-69), $40\%$
female) were divided into groups according to median AF
burden $(<0.5\%$ vs. $≥0.5\%)$ after ablation. Overall
cognitive performance did not differ in patients with an AF
$burden < 0.5\%$ (median $120\%$ [IQR 100-150]) vs.
$≥0.5\%$ (median $120\%$ [IQR 100-160]) within six months
after ablation (p = 0.74). Comparing Δpre/post, patients
with an AF $burden ≥ 0.5\%$ showed significantly better
results in the digit-span backwards test (median + 1 [IQR
0 - +2 points]) compared to patients with an AF
$burden < 0.5\%$ (median 0 [IQR -1-+1]) six months after
ablation (p = 0.03). In patients with an AF
$burden < 0.5\%,$ there was a statistical trend towards
better results in the RAVLT test (median + 3 [IQR 0-+4];
p = 0.08) and the ROC test (median + 3 [IQR -1-+5;
p = 0.07) compared to patients with an AF
$burden ≥ 0.5\%$ (median -1 [IQR -3-+2] words and median
-1 [IQR -5-+2] points, respectively). Therefore, AF burden
had no significant impact on cognitive performance within
six months after ablation. Clinical Trial Registration:
clinicaltrials.gov NCT01061931.},
keywords = {Aged / Atrial Fibrillation: complications / Atrial
Fibrillation: physiopathology / Atrial Fibrillation: surgery
/ Catheter Ablation: methods / Cognition / Cognition
Disorders: epidemiology / Cognition Disorders: etiology /
Female / Humans / Male / Middle Aged / Prospective Studies /
Treatment Outcome},
cin = {AG Endres},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-2719)1811005},
pnm = {344 - Clinical and Health Care Research (POF3-344)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-344},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:31992513},
doi = {10.1016/j.jocn.2019.12.030},
url = {https://pub.dzne.de/record/144990},
}