000145624 001__ 145624
000145624 005__ 20200925192541.0
000145624 037__ $$aDZNE-2020-00954
000145624 041__ $$aEnglish
000145624 082__ $$a150
000145624 1001_ $$0P:(DE-2719)2810583$$aWolbers, Thomas$$b0$$udzne
000145624 1112_ $$a12th Biannual Conference of the German Cognitive Science Society (Gesellschaft für Kognitionswissenschaft)$$cTübingen$$d2014-09-29 - 2014-10-02$$wGermany
000145624 245__ $$aPhysiological changes through sensory augmentation in path integration: an fMRI study
000145624 260__ $$c2014
000145624 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)1$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aAbstract$$babstract$$mabstract$$s1597400774_15937
000145624 3367_ $$033$$2EndNote$$aConference Paper
000145624 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aINPROCEEDINGS
000145624 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aconferenceObject
000145624 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$mjournal
000145624 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Conference Abstract
000145624 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aOTHER
000145624 520__ $$aThe theory of sensorimotor contingencies (SMCs) describes qualita-tive  experience  as  based  on  the  dependency  between  sensory  inputand  its  preceding  motor  actions.  To  investigate  sensory  processingand learning of new SMCs we used sensory augmentation in a virtualpath  integration  task.  Specifically,  we  built  a  belt  that  maps  direc-tional information of a compass to a set of vibrating elements such asthat the element pointing north is always activated. The belt changesits  tactile  signals  only  by  motor  actions  of  the  belt-wearing  partici-pants, i.e. when turning around.Nine  subjects  wore  the  belt  during  all  waking  hours  for  sevenweeks, 5 control subjects actively trained their navigation, but withouta belt (age 19–32y, seven female). Before and after the training periodwe presented in the fMRI scanner a virtual path integration (PI) taskand a corresponding control task with identical visual stimuli. In halfof  the  trials  of  both  tasks  the  belt  was  switched  on,  coherentlyvibrating with the virtual movements of the subjects.We  used  ROI  analysis  to  concentrate  on  regions  relevant  forspatial  navigation  and  for  sensory  processing.  We  used  a  mixed-effects  ANOVA  to  decompose  the  four  factors  belt  on/off,  belt/control   subjects,   PI/control   task,   and   before/after   training.   Themain effect  PI[control  task  shows  large-scale  differences  in  areasthat  have  been  found  to  be  active  in  similar  navigational  taskssuch  as  medial  superior  temporal  cortices  (MST),  posterior  parietalcortex   (PPC),   ventral   intraparietal   areas,   and   caudate   nucleus.Additionally  we  found  sensorimotor  regions  such  as  supplementarymotor  areas  (SMA),  insula,  primary  sensory  cortex,  and  precentralgyrus.   The  main  effect  belt  on[off  reveals   processing  of  the tactile   signals   in   expected   sensory   areas   such   as   the   primarysensory   cortex,   supramarginal   gyri,   and   Rolandic   opercula.   Insecond-level  analyses  significant  2-way  interactions   between  thebelt  on/off  and  pre/post  training  condition  indicates  an  involvementof  Rolandic  opercula,  Insula,  MST  and  PPC.  Inspection  of  theactivation  intensities  shows  a  significant  difference  belt  on[offonly  in  the  first  measurement  before  the  training  period,  but  notafter  the  training  period.In summary, in  fMRI we observe  differential  activations in  areasexpected for path integration tasks and tactile stimulation. Additionally,we also found activation differences for the belt signals well beyond the somatosensory system, indicating that processing is not limited to sen-sory areas but includes also higher level and motor regions as predicted bythe  theory  of  sensorimotor  contingencies.  It  is  demonstrated  that  thebelt’s signal is processed differently after the training period. Our fMRIresults are also in line with subjective reports indicating a qualitativechange in the perception of the belt signals.
000145624 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-344$$a344 - Clinical and Health Care Research (POF3-344)$$cPOF3-344$$fPOF III$$x0
000145624 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2075054-7$$n1$$pS73$$tCognitive processing$$v15$$x1612-4782$$y2014
000145624 8564_ $$uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10339-014-0632-2.pdf
000145624 909CO $$ooai:pub.dzne.de:145624$$pVDB
000145624 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588)1065079516$$6P:(DE-2719)2810583$$aDeutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen$$b0$$kDZNE
000145624 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-344$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-340$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-300$$aDE-HGF$$bForschungsbereich Gesundheit$$lErkrankungen des Nervensystems$$vClinical and Health Care Research$$x0
000145624 9141_ $$y2014
000145624 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)3002$$2StatID$$aDEAL Springer$$d2019-12-20$$wger
000145624 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS$$d2019-12-20
000145624 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline$$d2019-12-20
000145624 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List$$d2019-12-20
000145624 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1110$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Clinical Medicine$$d2019-12-20
000145624 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0160$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEssential Science Indicators$$d2019-12-20
000145624 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0130$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSocial Sciences Citation Index$$d2019-12-20
000145624 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1180$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Social and Behavioral Sciences$$d2019-12-20
000145624 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bCOGN PROCESS : 2018$$d2019-12-20
000145624 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5$$d2019-12-20
000145624 9201_ $$0I:(DE-2719)1310002$$kAG Wolbers$$lAging & Cognition$$x0
000145624 980__ $$aabstract
000145624 980__ $$aVDB
000145624 980__ $$ajournal
000145624 980__ $$aI:(DE-2719)1310002
000145624 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED