000151592 001__ 151592
000151592 005__ 20230915094003.0
000151592 0247_ $$2pmid$$apmid:32001337
000151592 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1016/j.nlm.2020.107176
000151592 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1074-7427
000151592 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1095-9564
000151592 037__ $$aDZNE-2020-01176
000151592 041__ $$aEnglish
000151592 082__ $$a570
000151592 1001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aUndorf, Monika$$b0
000151592 245__ $$aThe neurocognitive basis of metamemory: Using the N400 to study the contribution of fluency to judgments of learning
000151592 260__ $$aOrlando, Fla.$$bAcademic Press$$c2020
000151592 264_1 $$2Crossref$$3print$$bElsevier BV$$c2020-03-01
000151592 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000151592 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000151592 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1601038240_8536
000151592 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000151592 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000151592 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000151592 520__ $$aMetamemory is crucial for monitoring, evaluating, and optimizing memory performance. The basis of metamemory, however, is a matter of considerable debate. In the present study, we examined the contribution of processing fluency—the ease of processing information during learning—to metamemory judgments. We recorded event-related potentials (ERPs) while participants studied related and unrelated word pairs across two study-test cycles in a judgment of learning (JOL) task. In the first study-test cycle, related pairs were associated with better cued recall, higher JOLs, and a reduced N400 amplitude than unrelated pairs. Crucially, between- and within subject correlational analyses indicated that reduced N400 amplitudes, indexing more fluent processing, were associated with higher JOLs. Furthermore, single-trial N400 mediated a small but significant portion of the relatedness effect on JOLs. In the second study-test cycle, relatedness still increased recall and JOLs. However, related and unrelated pairs did not differ in N400 amplitude. Rather, unrelated pairs elicited a parietal positivity in a later time window that partially mediated the relatedness effect on JOLs. Together, these results suggest that processing fluency, indexed by the N400, contributes to the relatedness effect on JOLs when novel word pairs are learned, but not when previously studied pairs are relearned. Our results also imply that aspects of fluency not captured by the N400 and/or explicit beliefs about memory contribute to JOLs. This study demonstrates the utility of ERPs in gaining new insights into the neurocognitive mechanisms of metamemory.
000151592 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-344$$a344 - Clinical and Health Care Research (POF3-344)$$cPOF3-344$$fPOF III$$x0
000151592 542__ $$2Crossref$$i2020-03-01$$uhttps://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/
000151592 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000151592 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aAdult
000151592 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aBrain: physiology
000151592 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aCues
000151592 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aElectroencephalography
000151592 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aEvoked Potentials
000151592 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aFemale
000151592 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aHumans
000151592 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aJudgment: physiology
000151592 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aLearning: physiology
000151592 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aMale
000151592 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aMental Recall: physiology
000151592 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aMetacognition: physiology
000151592 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aSemantics
000151592 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aYoung Adult
000151592 7001_ $$0P:(DE-2719)2812748$$aAmaefule, Chimezie Obioma$$b1$$udzne
000151592 7001_ $$00000-0002-5440-3441$$aKamp, Siri-Maria$$b2$$eCorresponding author
000151592 77318 $$2Crossref$$3journal-article$$a10.1016/j.nlm.2020.107176$$b : Elsevier BV, 2020-03-01$$p107176$$tNeurobiology of Learning and Memory$$v169$$x1074-7427$$y2020
000151592 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)1471414-0$$a10.1016/j.nlm.2020.107176$$gVol. 169, p. 107176 -$$p107176$$tNeurobiology of learning and memory$$v169$$x1074-7427$$y2020
000151592 909CO $$ooai:pub.dzne.de:151592$$pVDB
000151592 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588)1065079516$$6P:(DE-2719)2812748$$aDeutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen$$b1$$kDZNE
000151592 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-344$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-340$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-300$$aDE-HGF$$bForschungsbereich Gesundheit$$lErkrankungen des Nervensystems$$vClinical and Health Care Research$$x0
000151592 9141_ $$y2020
000151592 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0160$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEssential Science Indicators$$d2020-01-10
000151592 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1190$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBiological Abstracts$$d2020-01-10
000151592 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0420$$2StatID$$aNationallizenz$$d2022-11-17$$wger
000151592 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bNEUROBIOL LEARN MEM : 2021$$d2022-11-17
000151592 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS$$d2022-11-17
000151592 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline$$d2022-11-17
000151592 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0600$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEbsco Academic Search$$d2022-11-17
000151592 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bASC$$d2022-11-17
000151592 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List$$d2022-11-17
000151592 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection$$d2022-11-17
000151592 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews$$d2022-11-17
000151592 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1030$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Life Sciences$$d2022-11-17
000151592 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0130$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSocial Sciences Citation Index$$d2022-11-17
000151592 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5$$d2022-11-17
000151592 9201_ $$0I:(DE-2719)1510100$$kClinical Dementia Research Rostock /Greifswald ; AG Teipel$$lClinical Dementia Research Rostock /Greifswald$$x0
000151592 980__ $$ajournal
000151592 980__ $$aVDB
000151592 980__ $$aI:(DE-2719)1510100
000151592 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED