% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Vogelgesang:154023,
      author       = {Vogelgesang, Lena and Reichert, Christoph and Hinrichs,
                      Hermann and Heinze, Hans-Jochen and Dürschmid, Stefan},
      title        = {{E}arly {S}hift of {A}ttention {I}s {N}ot {R}egulated by
                      {M}ind {W}andering in {V}isual {S}earch},
      journal      = {Frontiers in neuroscience},
      volume       = {14},
      issn         = {1662-453X},
      address      = {Lausanne},
      publisher    = {Frontiers Research Foundation},
      reportid     = {DZNE-2021-00008},
      pages        = {552637},
      year         = {2020},
      abstract     = {Unique to humans is the ability to report subjective
                      awareness of a broad repertoire of external and internal
                      events. Even when asked to focus on external information,
                      the human’s mind repeatedly wanders to task-unrelated
                      thoughts, which limits reading comprehension or the ability
                      to withhold automated manual responses. This led to the
                      attentional decoupling account of mind wandering (MW).
                      However, manual responses are not an ideal parameter to
                      study attentional decoupling, given that during MW, the
                      online adjustment of manual motor responses is impaired.
                      Hence, whether early attentional mechanisms are indeed
                      downregulated during MW or only motor responses being slowed
                      is not clear. In contrast to manual motor responses, eye
                      movements are considered a sensitive proxy of attentional
                      shifts. Using a simple target detection task, we asked
                      subjects to indicate whether a target was presented within a
                      visual search display by pressing a button while we recorded
                      eye movements and unpredictably asked the subjects to rate
                      their actual level of MW. Generally, manual reaction times
                      increased with MW, both in target absent and present trials.
                      But importantly, even in trials with MW, subjects detected
                      earlier a presented than an absent target. The decoupling
                      account would predict more fixations of the target before
                      pressing the button during MW. However, our results did not
                      corroborate this assumption. Most importantly, subject’s
                      time to direct gaze at the target was equally fast in trials
                      with and without MW. Our results corroborate our hypothesis
                      that during MW early, bottom–up driven attentional
                      processes are not decoupled but selectively manual motor
                      responses are slowed.},
      cin          = {U Clinical Researchers - Magdeburg},
      ddc          = {610},
      cid          = {I:(DE-2719)7000000},
      pnm          = {344 - Clinical and Health Care Research (POF3-344)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-344},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      pubmed       = {pmid:33117116},
      pmc          = {pmc:PMC7561678},
      doi          = {10.3389/fnins.2020.552637},
      url          = {https://pub.dzne.de/record/154023},
}