Home > Publications Database > Early Shift of Attention Is Not Regulated by Mind Wandering in Visual Search > print

001     154023
005     20240418115821.0
024 7 _ |a pmid:33117116
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a 10.3389/fnins.2020.552637
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 1662-453X
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1662-4548
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a altmetric:91613655
|2 altmetric
024 7 _ |a pmc:PMC7561678
|2 pmc
037 _ _ |a DZNE-2021-00008
041 _ _ |a English
082 _ _ |a 610
100 1 _ |a Vogelgesang, Lena
|b 0
245 _ _ |a Early Shift of Attention Is Not Regulated by Mind Wandering in Visual Search
260 _ _ |a Lausanne
|c 2020
|b Frontiers Research Foundation
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1713430109_19144
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Unique to humans is the ability to report subjective awareness of a broad repertoire of external and internal events. Even when asked to focus on external information, the human’s mind repeatedly wanders to task-unrelated thoughts, which limits reading comprehension or the ability to withhold automated manual responses. This led to the attentional decoupling account of mind wandering (MW). However, manual responses are not an ideal parameter to study attentional decoupling, given that during MW, the online adjustment of manual motor responses is impaired. Hence, whether early attentional mechanisms are indeed downregulated during MW or only motor responses being slowed is not clear. In contrast to manual motor responses, eye movements are considered a sensitive proxy of attentional shifts. Using a simple target detection task, we asked subjects to indicate whether a target was presented within a visual search display by pressing a button while we recorded eye movements and unpredictably asked the subjects to rate their actual level of MW. Generally, manual reaction times increased with MW, both in target absent and present trials. But importantly, even in trials with MW, subjects detected earlier a presented than an absent target. The decoupling account would predict more fixations of the target before pressing the button during MW. However, our results did not corroborate this assumption. Most importantly, subject’s time to direct gaze at the target was equally fast in trials with and without MW. Our results corroborate our hypothesis that during MW early, bottom–up driven attentional processes are not decoupled but selectively manual motor responses are slowed.
536 _ _ |a 344 - Clinical and Health Care Research (POF3-344)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-344
|c POF3-344
|f POF III
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |a Reichert, Christoph
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Hinrichs, Hermann
|0 P:(DE-2719)2000009
|b 2
|u dzne
700 1 _ |a Heinze, Hans-Jochen
|0 P:(DE-2719)2260426
|b 3
|u dzne
700 1 _ |a Dürschmid, Stefan
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 4
|e Corresponding author
773 _ _ |a 10.3389/fnins.2020.552637
|g Vol. 14, p. 552637
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2411902-7
|p 552637
|t Frontiers in neuroscience
|v 14
|y 2020
|x 1662-453X
856 4 _ |u https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2020.552637/full
856 4 _ |u https://pub.dzne.de/record/154023/files/DZNE-2021-00008.pdf
|y OpenAccess
856 4 _ |u https://pub.dzne.de/record/154023/files/DZNE-2021-00008.pdf?subformat=pdfa
|x pdfa
|y OpenAccess
909 C O |o oai:pub.dzne.de:154023
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p VDB
|p driver
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen
|0 I:(DE-588)1065079516
|k DZNE
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-2719)2000009
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen
|0 I:(DE-588)1065079516
|k DZNE
|b 3
|6 P:(DE-2719)2260426
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Gesundheit
|l Erkrankungen des Nervensystems
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-340
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-344
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-300
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Clinical and Health Care Research
|x 0
913 2 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Programmungebundene Forschung
|l ohne Programm
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-890
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-899
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-800
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v ohne Topic
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2020
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2022-11-09
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY (No Version)
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBYNV
|2 V:(DE-HGF)
|b DOAJ
|d 2020-08-26
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
|d 2022-11-09
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1190
|2 StatID
|b Biological Abstracts
|d 2020-08-26
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2022-11-09
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b FRONT NEUROSCI-SWITZ : 2021
|d 2022-11-09
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ Seal
|d 2021-05-11T13:19:45Z
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2020-08-26
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ
|d 2021-05-11T13:19:45Z
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2022-11-09
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2022-11-09
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ : Blind peer review
|d 2021-05-11T13:19:45Z
915 _ _ |a Article Processing Charges
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0561
|2 StatID
|d 2020-08-26
915 _ _ |a IF >= 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9905
|2 StatID
|b FRONT NEUROSCI-SWITZ : 2021
|d 2022-11-09
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2020-08-26
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1110
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Clinical Medicine
|d 2022-11-09
915 _ _ |a Fees
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0700
|2 StatID
|d 2020-08-26
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-2719)7000000
|k U Clinical Researchers - Magdeburg
|l U Clinical Researchers - Magdeburg
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-2719)7000000
980 1 _ |a FullTexts

LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21