% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Campanella:154396,
author = {Campanella, Salvatore and Arikan, Kemal and Babiloni,
Claudio and Balconi, Michela and Bertollo, Maurizio and
Betti, Viviana and Bianchi, Luigi and Brunovsky, Martin and
Buttinelli, Carla and Comani, Silvia and Di Lorenzo, Giorgio
and Dumalin, Daniel and Escera, Carles and Fallgatter,
Andreas and Fisher, Derek and Giordano, Giulia Maria and
Guntekin, Bahar and Imperatori, Claudio and Ishii, Ryouhei
and Kajosch, Hendrik and Kiang, Michael and López-Caneda,
Eduardo and Missonnier, Pascal and Mucci, Armida and
Olbrich, Sebastian and Otte, Georges and Perrottelli, Andrea
and Pizzuti, Alessandra and Pinal, Diego and Salisbury, Dean
and Tang, Yingying and Tisei, Paolo and Wang, Jijun and
Winkler, Istvan and Yuan, Jiajin and Pogarell, Oliver},
title = {{S}pecial {R}eport on the {I}mpact of the {COVID}-19
{P}andemic on {C}linical {EEG} and {R}esearch and
{C}onsensus {R}ecommendations for the {S}afe {U}se of
{EEG}.},
journal = {Clinical EEG and neuroscience},
volume = {52},
number = {1},
issn = {2169-5202},
address = {London},
publisher = {Sage},
reportid = {DZNE-2021-00249},
pages = {3 - 28},
year = {2021},
note = {ISSN 2169-5202 not unique: **3 hits**.},
abstract = {The global COVID-19 pandemic has affected the economy,
daily life, and mental/physical health. The latter includes
the use of electroencephalography (EEG) in clinical practice
and research. We report a survey of the impact of COVID-19
on the use of clinical EEG in practice and research in
several countries, and the recommendations of an
international panel of experts for the safe application of
EEG during and after this pandemic.Fifteen clinicians from 8
different countries and 25 researchers from 13 different
countries reported the impact of COVID-19 on their EEG
activities, the procedures implemented in response to the
COVID-19 pandemic, and precautions planned or already
implemented during the reopening of EEG activities.Of the 15
clinical centers responding, 11 reported a total stoppage of
all EEG activities, while 4 reduced the number of tests per
day. In research settings, all 25 laboratories reported a
complete stoppage of activity, with 7 laboratories reopening
to some extent since initial closure. In both settings,
recommended precautions for restarting or continuing EEG
recording included strict hygienic rules, social distance,
and assessment for infection symptoms among staff and
patients/participants.The COVID-19 pandemic interfered with
the use of EEG recordings in clinical practice and even more
in clinical research. We suggest updated best practices to
allow safe EEG recordings in both research and clinical
settings. The continued use of EEG is important in those
with psychiatric diseases, particularly in times of social
alarm such as the COVID-19 pandemic.},
subtyp = {Editorial},
keywords = {Brain: physiopathology / Brain Mapping: methods / COVID-19:
physiopathology / COVID-19: virology / Consensus /
Electroencephalography: adverse effects /
Electroencephalography: methods / Humans / Mental Disorders:
physiopathology / SARS-CoV-2: pathogenicity / COVID-19
(Other) / event-related oscillations (EROs) (Other) /
event-related potentials (ERPs) (Other) / psychiatry (Other)
/ quantitative EEG (qEEG) (Other) / resting state
electroencephalography (rsEEG) (Other)},
cin = {ICRU},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-2719)1240005},
pnm = {353 - Clinical and Health Care Research (POF4-353)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-353},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pmc = {pmc:PMC8121213},
pubmed = {pmid:32975150},
doi = {10.1177/1550059420954054},
url = {https://pub.dzne.de/record/154396},
}