% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Kufner:155122,
author = {Kufner, Anna and Ali, Huma Fatima and Ebinger, Martin and
Fiebach, Jochen B and Liebeskind, David S and Endres,
Matthias and Siegerink, Bob},
collaboration = {VISTA-{Endovascular Collaborators}},
title = {{T}he smoking paradox in ischemic stroke patients treated
with intra-arterial thrombolysis in combination with
mechanical thrombectomy-{VISTA}-{E}ndovascular.},
journal = {PLOS ONE},
volume = {16},
number = {5},
issn = {1932-6203},
address = {San Francisco, California, US},
publisher = {PLOS},
reportid = {DZNE-2021-00443},
pages = {e0251888},
year = {2021},
abstract = {The smoking-paradox of a better outcome in ischemic stroke
patients who smoke may be due to increased efficacy of
thrombolysis. We investigated the effect of smoking on
outcome following endovascular therapy (EVT) with mechanical
thrombectomy alone versus in combination with intra-arterial
(IA-) thrombolysis.The primary endpoint was defined by
three-month modified Rankin Scale (mRS). We performed a
generalized linear model and reported relative risks (RR)
for smoking (adjustment for age, sex, hypertension, atrial
fibrillation, stroke severity, time to EVT) in patient data
stemming from the Virtual International Stroke Trials
Archive-Endovascular database.Among 1,497 patients,
$740(49.4\%)$ were randomized to EVT; among EVT patients,
$524(35.0\%)$ received mechanical thrombectomy alone and
$216(14.4\%)$ received it in combination with
IA-thrombolysis. Smokers (N = 396) had lower mRS scores
(mean 2.9 vs. 3.2; p = 0.02) and mortality rates $(10\%$ vs.
$17.3\%;$ p<0.001) in univariate analysis. In all patients
and in patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy alone,
smoking had no effect on outcome in regression analyses. In
patients who received IA-thrombolysis (N = $216;14\%),$
smoking had an adjusted RR of 1.65 for an mRS≤1 $(95\%CI$
0.77-3.55). Treatment with IA-thrombolysis itself led to
reduced RR for favorable outcome (adjusted RR 0.30);
interaction analysis of IA-thrombolysis and smoking revealed
that non-smokers with IA-thrombolysis had mRS≤2 in 47
cases $(30\%,$ adjusted RR 0.53 [0.41-0.69]) while smokers
with IA-thrombolysis had mRS≤2 in 23 cases $(38\%,$
adjusted RR 0.61 [0.42-0.87]).Smokers had no clear clinical
benefit from EVT that incorporates IA-thrombolysis.},
keywords = {Aged / Atrial Fibrillation: complications / Atrial
Fibrillation: physiopathology / Endovascular Procedures:
methods / Female / Humans / Hypertension: complications /
Hypertension: physiopathology / Ischemic Stroke:
physiopathology / Ischemic Stroke: rehabilitation / Ischemic
Stroke: therapy / Male / Mechanical Thrombolysis: methods /
Middle Aged / Smoking: adverse effects / Smoking:
physiopathology / Thrombectomy: adverse effects /
Thrombolytic Therapy: methods / Tobacco Smoking: adverse
effects / Treatment Outcome},
cin = {AG Endres},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-2719)1811005},
pnm = {353 - Clinical and Health Care Research (POF4-353)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-353},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:34014988},
pmc = {pmc:PMC8136663},
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0251888},
url = {https://pub.dzne.de/record/155122},
}