% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{GburekAugustat:155692,
author = {Gburek-Augustat, Janina and Schoene-Bake, Jan-Christoph and
Bültmann, Eva and Haack, Tobias and Buchert, Rebecca and
Synofzik, Matthis and Biskup, Saskia and Feuerhake,
Friedrich and Sorge, Ina and Hartmann, Hans},
title = {{P}itfalls in {G}enetic {D}iagnostics: {W}hy {P}henotyping
is {E}ssential.},
journal = {Neuropediatrics},
volume = {52},
number = {4},
issn = {1439-1899},
address = {Stuttgart [u.a.]},
publisher = {Thieme},
reportid = {DZNE-2021-00860},
pages = {274 - 283},
year = {2021},
abstract = {New genetic testing technologies have revolutionized
medicine within the past years. It is foreseeable that the
development will continue with the introduction of new
techniques. Nevertheless, despite improved technology, an
exact clinical description of the phenotype is still
necessary and it is important to critically question
findings, both before initiating genetic testing and when
interpreting the results. We present four brief case
vignettes to point out difficulties associated with
correctly interpreting genetic findings.},
keywords = {Genetic Testing / Humans / Phenotype},
cin = {AG Gasser 1},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-2719)1210000},
pnm = {353 - Clinical and Health Care Research (POF4-353)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-353},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:33791999},
doi = {10.1055/s-0041-1726306},
url = {https://pub.dzne.de/record/155692},
}