% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Georges:157797,
author = {Georges, Daniela and Buber-Ennser, Isabella and Rengs,
Bernhard and Kohlenberger, Judith and Doblhammer-Reiter,
Gabriele},
title = {{H}ealth determinants among refugees in {A}ustria and
{G}ermany: {A} propensity-matched comparative study for
{S}yrian, {A}fghan, and {I}raqi refugees.},
journal = {PLOS ONE},
volume = {16},
number = {4},
issn = {1932-6203},
address = {San Francisco, California, US},
publisher = {PLOS},
reportid = {DZNE-2021-01254},
pages = {e0250821},
year = {2021},
note = {CC BY},
abstract = {In recent years, Germany and Austria have been among the
leading European receiving countries for asylum seekers and
refugees $(AS\&R).$ The two countries have cultural and
economic similarities, but differ, for example, in their
health care systems, with $AS\&R$ having unrestricted access
to health services upon arrival in Austria, but not in
Germany. This study investigates the determinants of health
among refugees in Austria and Germany, and how these
determinants differ between the two countries. We analyze
comparable and harmonized survey data from both countries
for Syrian, Afghan, and Iraqi nationals aged 18 to 59 years
who had immigrated between 2013 and 2016 (Germany: n =
2,854; Austria: n = 374). The study adopts a cross-sectional
design, and uses propensity score matching to examine
comparable $AS\&R$ in the two receiving countries. The
results reveal that the $AS\&R$ in Germany $(72\%)$ were
significantly less likely to report being in (very) good
health than their peers in Austria $(89\%).$ Age and
education had large impacts on health, whereas the effects
of length of stay and length of asylum process were smaller.
Compositional differences in terms of age, sex, nationality,
education, and partnership situation explained the country
differences only in part. After applying propensity score
matching to adjust for structural differences and to assess
non-confounded country effects, the probability of reporting
(very) good health was still 12 percentage points lower in
Germany than in Austria. We conclude that many of the
determinants of health among $AS\&R$ correspond to those in
the non-migrant population, and thus call for the
implementation of similar health policies. The health
disadvantage found among the $AS\&R$ in Germany suggests
that removing their initially restricted access to health
care may improve their health.},
keywords = {Adult / Afghanistan / Age Factors / Austria: ethnology /
Cross-Sectional Studies / Educational Status / Female /
Germany: ethnology / Health Policy / Health Services
Accessibility: statistics $\&$ numerical data / Health
Status / Humans / Iraq / Male / Middle Aged / Propensity
Score / Refugees: classification / Refugees: statistics $\&$
numerical data / Syria / Young Adult},
cin = {AG Doblhammer-Reiter},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-2719)1012002},
pnm = {354 - Disease Prevention and Healthy Aging (POF4-354)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-354},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:33909696},
pmc = {pmc:PMC8081210},
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0250821},
url = {https://pub.dzne.de/record/157797},
}