% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Biel:162705,
author = {Biel, Davina and Brendel, Matthias and Rubinski, Anna and
Bürger, Katharina and Janowitz, Daniel and Dichgans, Martin
and Franzmeier, Nicolai},
collaboration = {Initiative, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging},
title = {{T}au-{PET} and in vivo {B}raak-staging as prognostic
markers of future cognitive decline in cognitively normal to
demented individuals.},
journal = {Alzheimer's research $\&$ therapy},
volume = {13},
number = {1},
issn = {1758-9193},
address = {London},
publisher = {BioMed Central},
reportid = {DZNE-2021-01362},
pages = {137},
year = {2021},
note = {CC BY},
abstract = {To systematically examine the clinical utility of tau-PET
and Braak-staging as prognostic markers of future cognitive
decline in older adults with and without cognitive
impairment.In this longitudinal study, we included 396
cognitively normal to dementia subjects with
18F-Florbetapir/18F-Florbetaben-amyloid-PET,
18F-Flortaucipir-tau-PET and ~ 2-year cognitive follow-up.
Annual change rates in global cognition (i.e., MMSE, ADAS13)
and episodic memory were calculated via linear-mixed models.
We determined global amyloid-PET (Centiloid) plus global and
Braak-stage-specific tau-PET SUVRs, which were stratified as
positive(+)/negative(-) at pre-established cut-offs,
classifying subjects as
Braak0/BraakI+/BraakI-IV+/BraakI-VI+/Braakatypical+. In
bootstrapped linear regression, we assessed the predictive
accuracy of global tau-PET SUVRs vs. Centiloid on subsequent
cognitive decline. To test for independent tau vs. amyloid
effects, analyses were further controlled for the contrary
PET-tracer. Using ANCOVAs, we tested whether more advanced
Braak-stage predicted accelerated future cognitive decline.
All models were controlled for age, sex, education,
diagnosis, and baseline cognition. Lastly, we determined
Braak-stage-specific conversion risk to mild cognitive
impairment (MCI) or dementia.Baseline global tau-PET SUVRs
explained more variance (partial R2) in future cognitive
decline than Centiloid across all cognitive tests (Cohen's d
~ 2, all tests p < 0.001) and diagnostic groups.
Associations between tau-PET and cognitive decline remained
consistent when controlling for Centiloid, while
associations between amyloid-PET and cognitive decline were
non-significant when controlling for tau-PET. More advanced
Braak-stage was associated with gradually worsening future
cognitive decline, independent of Centiloid or diagnostic
group (p < 0.001), and elevated conversion risk to
MCI/dementia.Tau-PET and Braak-staging are highly predictive
markers of future cognitive decline and may be promising
single-modality estimates for prognostication of
patient-specific progression risk in clinical settings.},
keywords = {Aged / Alzheimer Disease: complications / Alzheimer
Disease: diagnostic imaging / Amyloid beta-Peptides /
Cognitive Dysfunction: diagnostic imaging / Humans /
Longitudinal Studies / Positron-Emission Tomography /
Prognosis / tau Proteins / Alzheimer’s disease (Other) /
Amyloid-PET (Other) / Braak-staging (Other) / Conversion
risk (Other) / Tau-PET (Other) / Amyloid beta-Peptides (NLM
Chemicals) / tau Proteins (NLM Chemicals)},
cin = {AG Höglinger 2},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-2719)1111015},
pnm = {353 - Clinical and Health Care Research (POF4-353)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-353},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:34384484},
pmc = {pmc:PMC8361801},
doi = {10.1186/s13195-021-00880-x},
url = {https://pub.dzne.de/record/162705},
}