% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Fahsold:163629,
      author       = {Fahsold, Anne and Schmüdderich, Kathrin and Verbeek, Hilde
                      and Holle, Bernhard and Palm, Rebecca},
      title        = {{F}easibility, {I}nterrater {R}eliability and {I}nternal
                      {C}onsistency of the {G}erman {E}nvironmental {A}udit {T}ool
                      ({G}-{EAT}).},
      journal      = {International journal of environmental research and public
                      health},
      volume       = {19},
      number       = {3},
      issn         = {1660-4601},
      address      = {Basel},
      publisher    = {MDPI AG},
      reportid     = {DZNE-2022-00375},
      pages        = {1050},
      year         = {2022},
      abstract     = {Dementia-specific environmental design has the potential to
                      positively influence capabilities for daily living and
                      quality of life in people with dementia living in nursing
                      homes. To date, no reliable instrument exists for
                      systematically assessing the adequacy of these built
                      environments in Germany. This study aimed to test the
                      adapted version of the Environmental Audit Tool-High Care
                      (EAT-HC)-the German Environmental Audit Tool (G-EAT)-with
                      regard to its feasibility, interrater reliability and
                      internal consistency. The G-EAT was applied as a
                      paper-pencil version in the German setting; intraclass
                      correlation coefficients at the subscale level ranged from
                      0.662 (III) to 0.869 (IV), and $42\%$ of the items showed at
                      least substantial agreement (Cohen's kappa ≥ 0.60). The
                      results indicate the need to develop supplementary material
                      in a manual that illustrates the meaning of the items and
                      practical implications regarding dementia-specific
                      environmental design. Furthermore, the intersectionality of
                      built and physical environments must be considered when
                      interpreting G-EAT results in future research and
                      applications to residential long-term care practice.},
      keywords     = {Dementia / Feasibility Studies / Humans / Nursing Homes /
                      Quality of Life / Reproducibility of Results / assessment
                      instrument (Other) / dementia (Other) / dementia-specific
                      environment (Other) / environmental design (Other) /
                      feasibility (Other) / long-term care (Other) / reliability
                      (Other)},
      cin          = {AG Halek / AG Roes 4 / AG Holle / AG Roes 2},
      ddc          = {610},
      cid          = {I:(DE-2719)1610001 / I:(DE-2719)1640001 /
                      I:(DE-2719)1610002 / I:(DE-2719)1610003},
      pnm          = {353 - Clinical and Health Care Research (POF4-353)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-353},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      pubmed       = {pmid:35162073},
      pmc          = {pmc:PMC8834608},
      doi          = {10.3390/ijerph19031050},
      url          = {https://pub.dzne.de/record/163629},
}