% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Scuteri:164544,
author = {Scuteri, D. and Contrada, M. and Loria, T. and Sturino, D.
and Cerasa, A. and Tonin, P. and Sandrini, G. and Tamburin,
S. and Bruni, A. C. and Nicotera, P. and Corasaniti, M. T.
and Bagetta, G.},
title = {{P}ain and agitation treatment in severe dementia patients:
{T}he need for {I}talian
{M}obilization–{O}bservation–{B}ehavior–{I}ntensity–{D}ementia
({I}-{MOBID}2) pain scale translation, adaptation and
validation with psychometric testing},
journal = {Biomedicine $\&$ pharmacotherapy},
volume = {150},
issn = {0300-0893},
address = {Paris [u.a.]},
publisher = {Elsevier},
reportid = {DZNE-2022-01093},
pages = {113013},
year = {2022},
note = {ISSN 0753-3322 not unique: **2 hits**.(CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)},
abstract = {The $97\%$ of dementia patients develops fluctuant
neuropsychiatric symptoms often related to under-diagnosed
and unrelieved pain. Up to $80\%$ severe demented nursing
home residents experiences chronic pain due to age-related
comorbidities. Patients lacking self-report skills risk not
to be appropriately treated for pain.
Mobilization–Observation–Behavior–Intensity–Dementia
(MOBID2) is the sole pain scale to consider the frequent
co-occurrence of musculoskeletal and visceral pain and to
unravel concealed pain through active guided movements.
Accordingly, the Italian real-world setting can benefit from
its translation and validation. This clinical study provides
a translated, adapted and validated version of the MOBID2,
the Italian I-MOBID2. The translation, adaptation and
validation of the scale for non-verbal, severe demented
patients was conducted according to current guidelines in a
cohort of 11 patients over 65 with mini-mental state
examination ≤ 12. The I-MOBID2 proves: good face and scale
content validity index (0.89); reliable internal consistency
(Cronbach’s α = 0.751); good to excellent inter-rater
(Intraclass correlation coefficient, and test-retest (ICC =
0.902) reliability. The construct validity is high (Rho =
0.748 p < 0.05 for 11 patients, Spearman rank order
correlation of the overall pain intensity score with the
maximum item score of I-MOBID2 Part 1; rho=0.895 p < 0.01
for 11 patients, for the overall pain intensity score with
the maximum item score of I-MOBID2 Part 2) and a good rate
of inter-rater and test-retest agreement was demonstrated by
Cohen’s K = 0.744. The average execution time is of 5.8
min, thus making I-MOBID2 a useful tool suitable also for
future development in community setting with administration
by caregivers.},
keywords = {Chronic Pain: psychology / Dementia: therapy / Humans /
Pain Measurement / Psychometrics / Reproducibility of
Results / Surveys and Questionnaires},
cin = {Scientific board / AG Bano},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-2719)1030000 / I:(DE-2719)1013003},
pnm = {351 - Brain Function (POF4-351)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-351},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:35658247},
doi = {10.1016/j.biopha.2022.113013},
url = {https://pub.dzne.de/record/164544},
}