% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence % of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older. % Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or % “biber”. @ARTICLE{Scuteri:164544, author = {Scuteri, D. and Contrada, M. and Loria, T. and Sturino, D. and Cerasa, A. and Tonin, P. and Sandrini, G. and Tamburin, S. and Bruni, A. C. and Nicotera, P. and Corasaniti, M. T. and Bagetta, G.}, title = {{P}ain and agitation treatment in severe dementia patients: {T}he need for {I}talian {M}obilization–{O}bservation–{B}ehavior–{I}ntensity–{D}ementia ({I}-{MOBID}2) pain scale translation, adaptation and validation with psychometric testing}, journal = {Biomedicine $\&$ pharmacotherapy}, volume = {150}, issn = {0300-0893}, address = {Paris [u.a.]}, publisher = {Elsevier}, reportid = {DZNE-2022-01093}, pages = {113013}, year = {2022}, note = {ISSN 0753-3322 not unique: **2 hits**.(CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)}, abstract = {The $97\%$ of dementia patients develops fluctuant neuropsychiatric symptoms often related to under-diagnosed and unrelieved pain. Up to $80\%$ severe demented nursing home residents experiences chronic pain due to age-related comorbidities. Patients lacking self-report skills risk not to be appropriately treated for pain. Mobilization–Observation–Behavior–Intensity–Dementia (MOBID2) is the sole pain scale to consider the frequent co-occurrence of musculoskeletal and visceral pain and to unravel concealed pain through active guided movements. Accordingly, the Italian real-world setting can benefit from its translation and validation. This clinical study provides a translated, adapted and validated version of the MOBID2, the Italian I-MOBID2. The translation, adaptation and validation of the scale for non-verbal, severe demented patients was conducted according to current guidelines in a cohort of 11 patients over 65 with mini-mental state examination ≤ 12. The I-MOBID2 proves: good face and scale content validity index (0.89); reliable internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.751); good to excellent inter-rater (Intraclass correlation coefficient, and test-retest (ICC = 0.902) reliability. The construct validity is high (Rho = 0.748 p < 0.05 for 11 patients, Spearman rank order correlation of the overall pain intensity score with the maximum item score of I-MOBID2 Part 1; rho=0.895 p < 0.01 for 11 patients, for the overall pain intensity score with the maximum item score of I-MOBID2 Part 2) and a good rate of inter-rater and test-retest agreement was demonstrated by Cohen’s K = 0.744. The average execution time is of 5.8 min, thus making I-MOBID2 a useful tool suitable also for future development in community setting with administration by caregivers.}, keywords = {Chronic Pain: psychology / Dementia: therapy / Humans / Pain Measurement / Psychometrics / Reproducibility of Results / Surveys and Questionnaires}, cin = {Scientific board / AG Bano}, ddc = {610}, cid = {I:(DE-2719)1030000 / I:(DE-2719)1013003}, pnm = {351 - Brain Function (POF4-351)}, pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-351}, typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16}, pubmed = {pmid:35658247}, doi = {10.1016/j.biopha.2022.113013}, url = {https://pub.dzne.de/record/164544}, }