Home > Publications Database > Reducing the tendency for chronometric counting in duration discrimination tasks > print

001     164817
005     20230915090556.0
024 7 _ |a pmid:35701662
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a 10.3758/s13414-022-02523-1
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 0031-5117
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1532-5962
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1943-3921
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1943-393X
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a altmetric:129726981
|2 altmetric
024 7 _ |a pmc:PMC9630250
|2 pmc
037 _ _ |a DZNE-2022-01261
082 _ _ |a 150
100 1 _ |a Riemer, Martin
|0 P:(DE-2719)2813753
|b 0
|e First author
|u dzne
245 _ _ |a Reducing the tendency for chronometric counting in duration discrimination tasks
260 _ _ |a New York, NY
|c 2022
|b Springer
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1667898502_7091
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
500 _ _ |a CC BY
520 _ _ |a Chronometric counting is a prevalent issue in the study of human time perception as it reduces the construct validity of tasks and can conceal existing timing deficits. Several methods have been proposed to prevent counting strategies, but the factors promoting those strategies in specific tasks are largely uninvestigated. Here, we modified a classical two-interval duration discrimination task in two aspects that could affect the tendency to apply counting strategies. We removed the pause between the two intervals and changed the task instructions: Participants decided whether a short event occurred in the first or in the second half of a reference duration. In Experiment 1, both classical and modified task versions were performed under timing conditions, in which participants were asked not to count, and counting conditions, in which counting was explicitly instructed. The task modifications led to (i) a general decrease in judgment precision, (ii) a shift of the point of subjective equality, and (iii) a counting-related increase in reaction times, suggesting enhanced cognitive effort of counting during the modified task version. Precision in the two task versions was not differently affected by instructed counting. Experiment 2 demonstrates that—in the absence of any counting-related instructions—participants are less likely to engage in spontaneous counting in the modified task version. These results enhance our understanding of the two-interval duration discrimination task and demonstrate that the modifications tested here—although they do not significantly reduce the effectiveness of instructed counting—can diminish the spontaneous tendency to adopt counting strategies.
536 _ _ |a 353 - Clinical and Health Care Research (POF4-353)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-353
|c POF4-353
|f POF IV
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: pub.dzne.de
650 _ 2 |a Humans
|2 MeSH
650 _ 2 |a Time Perception
|2 MeSH
650 _ 2 |a Reaction Time
|2 MeSH
650 _ 2 |a Judgment
|2 MeSH
650 _ 2 |a Time Factors
|2 MeSH
700 1 _ |a Vieweg, Paula
|0 P:(DE-2719)2810529
|b 1
|u dzne
700 1 _ |a van Rijn, Hedderik
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Wolbers, Thomas
|0 P:(DE-2719)2810583
|b 3
|e Last author
|u dzne
773 _ _ |a 10.3758/s13414-022-02523-1
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2480891-X
|n 8
|p 2641-2654
|t Attention, perception, & psychophysics
|v 84
|y 2022
|x 0031-5117
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|u https://pub.dzne.de/record/164817/files/DZNE-2022-01261.pdf
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x pdfa
|u https://pub.dzne.de/record/164817/files/DZNE-2022-01261.pdf?subformat=pdfa
909 C O |o oai:pub.dzne.de:164817
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p VDB
|p driver
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen
|0 I:(DE-588)1065079516
|k DZNE
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-2719)2813753
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen
|0 I:(DE-588)1065079516
|k DZNE
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-2719)2810529
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen
|0 I:(DE-588)1065079516
|k DZNE
|b 3
|6 P:(DE-2719)2810583
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Gesundheit
|l Neurodegenerative Diseases
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-350
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-353
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-300
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Clinical and Health Care Research
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2022
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2021-02-04
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1190
|2 StatID
|b Biological Abstracts
|d 2021-02-04
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2021-02-04
915 _ _ |a DEAL Springer
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)3002
|2 StatID
|d 2021-02-04
|w ger
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2022-11-22
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2022-11-22
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2022-11-22
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1180
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Social and Behavioral Sciences
|d 2022-11-22
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2022-11-22
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
|d 2022-11-22
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0130
|2 StatID
|b Social Sciences Citation Index
|d 2022-11-22
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b ATTEN PERCEPT PSYCHO : 2021
|d 2022-11-22
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
|d 2022-11-22
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
|d 2022-11-22
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
|d 2022-11-22
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-2719)1310002
|k AG Wolbers
|l Aging & Cognition
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-2719)1310002
980 1 _ |a FullTexts

LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21