001     164826
005     20240826165947.0
024 7 _ |a pmc:PMC9199443
|2 pmc
024 7 _ |a 10.3389/fdgth.2022.892997
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a altmetric:129093447
|2 altmetric
024 7 _ |a pmid:35721797
|2 pmid
037 _ _ |a DZNE-2022-01270
082 _ _ |a 610
100 1 _ |a Berron, David
|0 P:(DE-2719)2812972
|b 0
|e First author
|u dzne
245 _ _ |a Feasibility of Digital Memory Assessments in an Unsupervised and Remote Study Setting
260 _ _ |a Lausanne
|c 2022
|b Frontiers Media
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1709566884_22644
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
500 _ _ |a CC BY
520 _ _ |a Sensitive and frequent digital remote memory assessments via mobile devices hold the promise to facilitate the detection of cognitive impairment and decline. However, in order to be successful at scale, cognitive tests need to be applicable in unsupervised settings and confounding factors need to be understood. This study explored the feasibility of completely unsupervised digital cognitive assessments using three novel memory tasks in a Citizen Science project across Germany. To that end, the study aimed to identify factors associated with stronger participant retention, to examine test-retest reliability and the extent of practice effects, as well as to investigate the influence of uncontrolled settings such as time of day, delay between sessions or screen size on memory performance. A total of 1,407 adults (aged 18–89) participated in the study for up to 12 weeks, completing weekly memory tasks in addition to short questionnaires regarding sleep duration, subjective cognitive complaints as well as cold symptoms. Participation across memory tasks was pseudorandomized such that individuals were assigned to one of three memory paradigms resulting in three otherwise identical sub-studies. One hundred thirty-eight participants contributed to two of the three paradigms. Critically, for each memory task 12 independent parallel test sets were used to minimize effects of repeated testing. First, we observed a mean participant retention time of 44 days, or 4 active test sessions, and 77.5% compliance to the study protocol in an unsupervised setting with no contact between participants and study personnel, payment or feedback. We identified subject-level factors that contributed to higher retention times. Second, we found minor practice effects associated with repeated cognitive testing, and reveal evidence for acceptable-to-good retest reliability of mobile testing. Third, we show that memory performance assessed through repeated digital assessments was strongly associated with age in all paradigms, and individuals with subjectively reported cognitive decline presented lower mnemonic discrimination accuracy compared to non-complaining participants. Finally, we identified design-related factors that need to be incorporated in future studies such as the time delay between test sessions. Our results demonstrate the feasibility of fully unsupervised digital remote memory assessments and identify critical factors to account for in future studies.
536 _ _ |a 353 - Clinical and Health Care Research (POF4-353)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-353
|c POF4-353
|f POF IV
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: pub.dzne.de
700 1 _ |a Ziegler, Gabriel
|0 P:(DE-2719)2814076
|b 1
|u dzne
700 1 _ |a Vieweg, Paula
|0 P:(DE-2719)2810529
|b 2
|u dzne
700 1 _ |a Billette, Ornella
|0 P:(DE-2719)2810799
|b 3
|u dzne
700 1 _ |a Guesten, Jeremie
|0 P:(DE-2719)9001505
|b 4
|u dzne
700 1 _ |a Grande, Xenia
|0 P:(DE-2719)2812729
|b 5
|u dzne
700 1 _ |a Heneka, Michael T.
|0 P:(DE-2719)2000008
|b 6
|u dzne
700 1 _ |a Schneider, Anja
|0 P:(DE-2719)2812035
|b 7
|u dzne
700 1 _ |a Teipel, Stefan
|0 P:(DE-2719)2000026
|b 8
|u dzne
700 1 _ |a Jessen, Frank
|0 P:(DE-2719)2000032
|b 9
|u dzne
700 1 _ |a Wagner, Michael
|0 P:(DE-2719)2000057
|b 10
|u dzne
700 1 _ |a Düzel, Emrah
|0 P:(DE-2719)2000005
|b 11
|e Last author
|u dzne
773 _ _ |a 10.3389/fdgth.2022.892997
|g Vol. 4, p. 892997
|0 PERI:(DE-600)3017798-4
|p 892997
|t Frontiers in digital health
|v 4
|y 2022
|x 2673-253X
856 4 _ |u https://pub.dzne.de/record/164826/files/DZNE-2022-01270.pdf
|y OpenAccess
856 4 _ |u https://pub.dzne.de/record/164826/files/DZNE-2022-01270.pdf?subformat=pdfa
|x pdfa
|y OpenAccess
909 C O |o oai:pub.dzne.de:164826
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p VDB
|p driver
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen
|0 I:(DE-588)1065079516
|k DZNE
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-2719)2812972
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen
|0 I:(DE-588)1065079516
|k DZNE
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-2719)2814076
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen
|0 I:(DE-588)1065079516
|k DZNE
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-2719)2810529
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen
|0 I:(DE-588)1065079516
|k DZNE
|b 3
|6 P:(DE-2719)2810799
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen
|0 I:(DE-588)1065079516
|k DZNE
|b 4
|6 P:(DE-2719)9001505
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen
|0 I:(DE-588)1065079516
|k DZNE
|b 5
|6 P:(DE-2719)2812729
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen
|0 I:(DE-588)1065079516
|k DZNE
|b 6
|6 P:(DE-2719)2000008
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen
|0 I:(DE-588)1065079516
|k DZNE
|b 7
|6 P:(DE-2719)2812035
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen
|0 I:(DE-588)1065079516
|k DZNE
|b 8
|6 P:(DE-2719)2000026
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen
|0 I:(DE-588)1065079516
|k DZNE
|b 9
|6 P:(DE-2719)2000032
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen
|0 I:(DE-588)1065079516
|k DZNE
|b 10
|6 P:(DE-2719)2000057
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen
|0 I:(DE-588)1065079516
|k DZNE
|b 11
|6 P:(DE-2719)2000005
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Gesundheit
|l Neurodegenerative Diseases
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-350
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-353
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-300
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Clinical and Health Care Research
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2022
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY (No Version)
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBYNV
|2 V:(DE-HGF)
|b DOAJ
|d 2020-09-03
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Article Processing Charges
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0561
|2 StatID
|d 2020-09-03
915 _ _ |a Fees
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0700
|2 StatID
|d 2020-09-03
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2022-11-17
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ Seal
|d 2021-05-13T10:45:31Z
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ
|d 2021-05-13T10:45:31Z
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ : Blind peer review
|d 2021-05-13T10:45:31Z
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-2719)5000070
|k AG Berron
|l Clinical Cognitive Neuroscience
|x 0
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-2719)5000006
|k AG Düzel
|l Clinical Neurophysiology and Memory
|x 1
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-2719)1310001
|k AG Nestor
|l Cognitive Neurology and Neurodegeneration
|x 2
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-2719)1011301
|k Biomarker
|l Interventional Trials and Biomarkers in Neurodegenerative Diseases
|x 3
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-2719)1011305
|k AG Schneider
|l Translational Dementia Research (Bonn)
|x 4
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-2719)1510100
|k AG Teipel
|l Clinical Dementia Research (Rostock /Greifswald)
|x 5
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-2719)1011102
|k AG Jessen
|l Clinical Alzheimer’s Disease Research
|x 6
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-2719)1011201
|k AG Wagner
|l Neuropsychology
|x 7
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-2719)5000070
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-2719)5000006
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-2719)1310001
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-2719)1011301
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-2719)1011305
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-2719)1510100
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-2719)1011102
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-2719)1011201
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 1 _ |a FullTexts


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21