% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Strain:165167,
author = {Strain, Jeremy F and Brier, Matthew R and Tanenbaum, Aaron
and Gordon, Brian A and McCarthy, John E and Dincer, Aylin
and Marcus, Daniel S and Chhatwal, Jasmeer P and
Graff-Radford, Neill R and Day, Gregory S and la Fougère,
Christian and Perrin, Richard J and Salloway, Stephen and
Schofield, Peter R and Yakushev, Igor and Ikeuchi, Takeshi
and Vöglein, Jonathan and Morris, John C and Benzinger,
Tammie L S and Bateman, Randall J and Ances, Beau M and
Snyder, Abraham Z},
collaboration = {Network, Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer},
title = {{C}ovariance-based vs. correlation-based functional
connectivity dissociates healthy aging from {A}lzheimer
disease.},
journal = {NeuroImage},
volume = {261},
issn = {1053-8119},
address = {Orlando, Fla.},
publisher = {Academic Press},
reportid = {DZNE-2022-01469},
pages = {119511},
year = {2022},
abstract = {Prior studies of aging and Alzheimer disease have evaluated
resting state functional connectivity (FC) using either
seed-based correlation (SBC) or independent component
analysis (ICA), with a focus on particular functional
systems. SBC and ICA both are insensitive to differences in
signal amplitude. At the same time, accumulating evidence
indicates that the amplitude of spontaneous BOLD signal
fluctuations is physiologically meaningful. We
systematically compared covariance-based FC, which is
sensitive to amplitude, vs. correlation-based FC, which is
not, in affected individuals and controls drawn from two
cohorts of participants including autosomal dominant
Alzheimer disease (ADAD), late onset Alzheimer disease
(LOAD), and age-matched controls. Functional connectivity
was computed over 222 regions of interest and group
differences were evaluated in terms of components projected
onto a space of lower dimension. Our principal observations
are: (1) Aging is associated with global loss of resting
state fMRI signal amplitude that is approximately uniform
across resting state networks. (2) Thus, covariance FC
measures decrease with age whereas correlation FC is
relatively preserved in healthy aging. (3) In contrast,
symptomatic ADAD and LOAD both lead to loss of spontaneous
activity amplitude as well as severely degraded correlation
structure. These results demonstrate a double dissociation
between age vs. Alzheimer disease and the amplitude vs.
correlation structure of resting state BOLD signals.
Modeling results suggest that the AD-associated loss of
correlation structure is attributable to a relative increase
in the fraction of locally restricted as opposed to widely
shared variance.},
keywords = {Aging / Alzheimer Disease: diagnostic imaging / Brain:
physiology / Healthy Aging / Humans / Magnetic Resonance
Imaging: methods / Aging (Other) / Autosomal dominant
Alzheimer disease (Other) / Covariance (Other) / Late onset
Alzheimer disease (Other) / Resting-state functional
connectivity (Other)},
cin = {Tübingen common},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-2719)6000018},
pnm = {353 - Clinical and Health Care Research (POF4-353)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-353},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pmc = {pmc:PMC9750733},
pubmed = {pmid:35914670},
doi = {10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119511},
url = {https://pub.dzne.de/record/165167},
}