% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Meyer:165183,
author = {Meyer, Thomas and Spittel, Susanne and Grehl, Torsten and
Weyen, Ute and Steinbach, Robert and Kettemann, Dagmar and
Petri, Susanne and Weydt, Patrick and Günther, René and
Baum, Petra and Schlapakow, Elena and Koch, Jan Christoph
and Boentert, Matthias and Wolf, Joachim and Grosskreutz,
Julian and Rödiger, Annekathrin and Ilse, Benjamin and
Metelmann, Moritz and Norden, Jenny and Koc, Ruhan Yasemin
and Körtvelyessy, Peter and Riitano, Alessio and Walter,
Bertram and Hildebrandt, Barbara and Schaudinn, Friedrich
and Münch, Christoph and Maier, André},
title = {{R}emote digital assessment of amyotrophic lateral
sclerosis functional rating scale - a multicenter
observational study.},
journal = {Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis $\&$ frontotemporal
degeneration},
volume = {24},
number = {3-4},
issn = {1466-0822},
address = {Abingdon},
publisher = {Taylor Francis Group},
reportid = {DZNE-2022-01485},
pages = {175-184},
year = {2023},
abstract = {Remote self-assessment of the revised amyotrophic lateral
sclerosis functional rating scale (ALSFRS-R) using digital
data capture was investigated for its feasibility as an
add-on to ALSFRS-R assessments during multidisciplinary
clinic visits.From August 2017 to December 2021, at 12 ALS
centers in Germany, an observational study on remote
assessment of the ALSFRS-R was performed. In addition to the
assessment of ALSFRS-R during clinic visits, patients were
offered a digital self-assessment of the ALSFRS-R - either
on a computer or on a mobile application ('ALS-App').An
estimated multicenter cohort of 4,670 ALS patients received
care at participating ALS centers. Of these patients, 971
remotely submitted the ALSFRS-R, representing $21\%$ of the
multicenter cohort. Of those who opted for remote
assessment, $53.7\%$ (n = 521) completed a minimum of 4
ALSFRS-R per year with a mean number of 10.9 assessments per
year. Different assessment frequencies were found for
patients using a computer (7.9 per year, n = 857) and mobile
app (14.6 per year, n = 234). Patients doing remote
assessments were more likely to be male and less
functionally impaired but many patients with severe
disability managed to complete it themselves or with a
caregiver $(35\%$ of remote ALSFRS-R cohort in King's Stage
4).In a dedicated ALS center setting remote digital
self-assessment of ALSFRS-R can provide substantial data
which is complementary and potentially an alternative to
clinic assessments and could be used for research purposes
and person-level patient management. Addressing barriers
relating to patient uptake and adherence are key to its
success.},
keywords = {Persons with Disabilities / Humans / Male / Female /
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: diagnosis / Disabled Persons
/ Germany / Disease Progression / ALS-App (Other) /
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (Other) / amyotrophic lateral
sclerosis functional rating scale-revised (Other) / remote
assessment (Other) / self-assessment (Other)},
cin = {Clinical Study Team Dresden ; AG Falkenburger},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-2719)1710012},
pnm = {353 - Clinical and Health Care Research (POF4-353)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-353},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:35912984},
doi = {10.1080/21678421.2022.2104649},
url = {https://pub.dzne.de/record/165183},
}