% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Kroon:165227,
author = {Kroon, Cristina and Breuer, Larissa and Jones, Lydia and
An, Jeehye and Akan, Ayça and Mohamed Ali, Elkhansa Ahmed
and Busch, Felix and Fislage, Marinus and Ghosh, Biswajit
and Hellrigel-Holderbaum, Max and Kazezian, Vartan and
Koppold, Alina and Moreira Restrepo, Cesar Alberto and
Riedel, Nico and Scherschinski, Lea and Urrutia Gonzalez,
Fernando Raúl and Weissgerber, Tracey L},
title = {{B}lind spots on western blots: {A}ssessment of common
problems in western blot figures and methods reporting with
recommendations to improve them.},
journal = {PLoS biology},
volume = {20},
number = {9},
issn = {1544-9173},
address = {Lawrence, KS},
publisher = {PLoS},
reportid = {DZNE-2022-01524},
pages = {e3001783},
year = {2022},
note = {CC BY: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/},
abstract = {Western blotting is a standard laboratory method used to
detect proteins and assess their expression levels.
Unfortunately, poor western blot image display practices and
a lack of detailed methods reporting can limit a reader's
ability to evaluate or reproduce western blot results. While
several groups have studied the prevalence of image
manipulation or provided recommendations for improving
western blotting, data on the prevalence of common
publication practices are scarce. We systematically examined
551 articles published in the top $25\%$ of journals in
neurosciences (n = 151) and cell biology (n = 400) that
contained western blot images, focusing on practices that
may omit important information. Our data show that most
published western blots are cropped and blot source data are
not made available to readers in the supplement. Publishing
blots with visible molecular weight markers is rare, and
many blots additionally lack molecular weight labels.
Western blot methods sections often lack information on the
amount of protein loaded on the gel, blocking steps, and
antibody labeling protocol. Important antibody identifiers
like company or supplier, catalog number, or RRID were
omitted frequently for primary antibodies and regularly for
secondary antibodies. We present detailed descriptions and
visual examples to help scientists, peer reviewers, and
editors to publish more informative western blot figures and
methods. Additional resources include a toolbox to help
scientists produce more reproducible western blot data,
teaching slides in English and Spanish, and an antibody
reporting template.},
keywords = {Antibodies / Blotting, Western / Neurosciences / Proteins /
Antibodies (NLM Chemicals) / Proteins (NLM Chemicals)},
cin = {AG Dean},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-2719)1813003},
pnm = {351 - Brain Function (POF4-351)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-351},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:36095010},
pmc = {pmc:PMC9518894},
doi = {10.1371/journal.pbio.3001783},
url = {https://pub.dzne.de/record/165227},
}