% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Hoffmann:169043,
author = {Hoffmann, Anna-Louisa and Bergmann, Johannes Michael and
Fahsold, Anne and Müller-Widmer, René and Roes, Martina
and Holle, Bernhard and Palm, Rebecca},
title = {{M}easuring person-centred care in german nursing homes -
exploring the construct validity of the {D}ementia {P}olicy
{Q}uestionnaire: a cross-sectional study of a secondary data
set.},
journal = {BMC geriatrics},
volume = {22},
number = {1},
issn = {1471-2318},
address = {London},
publisher = {BioMed Central},
reportid = {DZNE-2022-01765},
pages = {914},
year = {2022},
abstract = {To ensure the sustainable implementation of
dementia-specific person-centred care (PCC) in nursing
homes, internal policies are crucial. The preliminary German
Dementia Policy Questionnaire, which features 19 dichotomous
items, assesses the existence of and evaluates these
policies. This article reports the results of an exploration
of the construct validity of the preliminary Dementia Policy
Questionnaire.This study is a cross-sectional study that
references a secondary data set drawn from a national survey
study of a randomized, stratified sample of 134 nursing
homes in Germany. To explore the construct validity of the
preliminary Dementia Policy Questionnaire, we conducted an
adjusted multiple correspondence analysis of the pretested
19-item assessment. We included data assessed using the
preliminary Dementia Policy Questionnaire from 134 care
units associated with 134 nursing homes; these data were
collected via telephone interviews with nursing home
administrators or their representatives.Two items assessing
visitor regulations and regulations regarding the inclusion
of residents in staff selection were less frequent and were
therefore excluded from the adjusted multiple correspondence
analysis. In total, nine items were assigned to two
dimensions. The items assigned to the first dimension assess
existing regulations for PCC as well as existing regulations
regarding the involvement of the resident, relatives and the
multiprofessional team in the collection of information
concerning preferences, case conferences or decision making.
The items assigned to the second dimension assess existing
regulations regarding the systematic assessment of resident
preferences and their requirements.The study produces
exploratory evidence concerning the preliminary Dementia
Policy Questionnaire. Since the dimensions of the items
included in this questionnaire cannot be conceptualized
clearly, the instrument in its current state requires
further development.},
keywords = {Humans / Cross-Sectional Studies / Nursing Homes / Policy /
Surveys and Questionnaires / Patient-Centered Care /
Dementia: diagnosis / Dementia: epidemiology / Dementia:
therapy / Construct validity (Other) / Dementia care (Other)
/ Instrument development (Other) / Nursing home (Other) /
Person-centred care (Other)},
cin = {AG Holle / AG Roes 4 / AG Halek / AG Roes 2},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-2719)1610002 / I:(DE-2719)1640001 /
I:(DE-2719)1610001 / I:(DE-2719)1610003},
pnm = {353 - Clinical and Health Care Research (POF4-353)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-353},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:36443654},
pmc = {pmc:PMC9706957},
doi = {10.1186/s12877-022-03586-3},
url = {https://pub.dzne.de/record/169043},
}