% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Dafsari:257675,
author = {Dafsari, Forugh S and Bewernick, Bettina and Böhringer,
Sabine and Domschke, Katharina and Elsaesser, Moritz and
Löbner, Margrit and Luppa, Melanie and Preis, Lukas and
Püsken, Julia and Schmitt, Sandra and Szekely,
Andreea-Johanna and Hellmich, Martin and Müller, Wiebke and
Wagner, Michael and Peters, Oliver and Frölich, Lutz and
Riedel-Heller, Steffi and Schramm, Elisabeth and Hautzinger,
Martin and Jessen, Frank},
title = {{C}ognitive {B}ehavioral {T}herapy for {L}ate-{L}ife
{D}epression ({CBT}late): {R}esults of a {M}ulticenter,
{R}andomized, {O}bserver-{B}linded, {C}ontrolled {T}rial.},
journal = {Psychotherapy and psychosomatics},
volume = {92},
issn = {0033-3190},
address = {Basel},
publisher = {Karger},
reportid = {DZNE-2023-00472},
pages = {180-192},
year = {2023},
abstract = {Different psychotherapeutic interventions for late-life
depression (LLD) have been proposed, but their evaluation in
large, multicenter trials is rare.The present study
evaluated the efficacy of a specific cognitive behavioral
therapy (CBT) for LLD (LLD-CBT) in comparison with a
supportive unspecific intervention (SUI), both administered
in a specialist psychiatric outpatient setting.In this
randomized, controlled, parallel group trial, we recruited
participants (≥60 years) with moderate to severe
depression at 7 trial sites in Germany. Participants were
randomly assigned to the LLD-CBT or SUI group. The primary
outcome was depression severity at the end of treatment
measured by change on the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS).
Secondary outcomes included change in observer-rated
depression, anxiety, sleep ratings, and quality of life
throughout the treatment phase and at 6-month
follow-up.Between October 1, 2018, and November 11, 2020, we
randomly assigned 251 patients to either LLD-CBT (n = 126)
or SUI (n = 125), of whom 229 provided primary-outcome data.
There was no significant between-group difference in the
change in GDS scores at the end of treatment (estimated
marginal mean difference: -1.01 $[95\%$ CI: -2.88 to 0.86];
p = 0.287). Secondary analyses showed significant
improvements in several outcomes after 8 weeks and at
follow-up in both treatment arms.Our data suggest that
LLD-specific CBT and a supportive unspecific treatment both
provide clinical benefit in patients with moderate to severe
LLD without evidence for superiority of LLD-CBT.},
keywords = {Humans / Aged / Depression: therapy / Depression:
psychology / Quality of Life / Treatment Outcome / Cognitive
Behavioral Therapy: methods / Depressive Disorder: therapy /
Cognitive behavioral therapy (Other) / Geriatric depression
(Other) / Late-life depression (Other) / Randomized
controlled trial (Other) / Supportive psychotherapy (Other)},
cin = {AG Jessen},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-2719)1011102},
pnm = {353 - Clinical and Health Care Research (POF4-353)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-353},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:37004508},
doi = {10.1159/000529445},
url = {https://pub.dzne.de/record/257675},
}