001     265755
005     20231120155400.0
024 7 _ |a 10.3389/fncel.2023.1166641
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a pmid:37868194
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a pmc:PMC10587494
|2 pmc
024 7 _ |a altmetric:155261234
|2 altmetric
037 _ _ |a DZNE-2023-01030
041 _ _ |a English
082 _ _ |a 610
100 1 _ |a Carido, Madalena
|b 0
245 _ _ |a Reliability of human retina organoid generation from hiPSC-derived neuroepithelial cysts.
260 _ _ |a Lausanne
|c 2023
|b Frontiers Research Foundation
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1700062829_31974
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a The possible applications for human retinal organoids (HROs) derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSC) rely on the robustness and transferability of the methodology for their generation. Standardized strategies and parameters to effectively assess, compare, and optimize organoid protocols are starting to be established, but are not yet complete. To advance this, we explored the efficiency and reliability of a differentiation method, called CYST protocol, that facilitates retina generation by forming neuroepithelial cysts from hiPSC clusters. Here, we tested seven different hiPSC lines which reproducibly generated HROs. Histological and ultrastructural analyses indicate that HRO differentiation and maturation are regulated. The different hiPSC lines appeared to be a larger source of variance than experimental rounds. Although previous reports have shown that HROs in several other protocols contain a rather low number of cones, HROs from the CYST protocol are consistently richer in cones and with a comparable ratio of cones, rods, and Müller glia. To provide further insight into HRO cell composition, we studied single cell RNA sequencing data and applied CaSTLe, a transfer learning approach. Additionally, we devised a potential strategy to systematically evaluate different organoid protocols side-by-side through parallel differentiation from the same hiPSC batches: In an explorative study, the CYST protocol was compared to a conceptually different protocol based on the formation of cell aggregates from single hiPSCs. Comparing four hiPSC lines showed that both protocols reproduced key characteristics of retinal epithelial structure and cell composition, but the CYST protocol provided a higher HRO yield. So far, our data suggest that CYST-derived HROs remained stable up to at least day 200, while single hiPSC-derived HROs showed spontaneous pathologic changes by day 200. Overall, our data provide insights into the efficiency, reproducibility, and stability of the CYST protocol for generating HROs, which will be useful for further optimizing organoid systems, as well as for basic and translational research applications.
536 _ _ |a 352 - Disease Mechanisms (POF4-352)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-352
|c POF4-352
|f POF IV
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed, , Journals: pub.dzne.de
650 _ 7 |a gliosis
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a hiPSC
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a human
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a neurodevelopment
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a organoid
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a pathology
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a retina
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a stem cells
|2 Other
700 1 _ |a Völkner, Manuela
|0 P:(DE-2719)2810390
|b 1
|e First author
|u dzne
700 1 _ |a Steinheuer, Lisa Maria
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Wagner, Felix
|0 P:(DE-2719)2811441
|b 3
|u dzne
700 1 _ |a Kurth, Thomas
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Dumler, Natalie
|0 P:(DE-2719)9001836
|b 5
|u dzne
700 1 _ |a Ulusoy, Selen
|0 P:(DE-2719)9001420
|b 6
|u dzne
700 1 _ |a Wieneke, Stephanie
|0 P:(DE-2719)2812103
|b 7
700 1 _ |a Norniella, Anabel Villanueva
|b 8
700 1 _ |a Golfieri, Cristina
|0 P:(DE-2719)2810498
|b 9
700 1 _ |a Khattak, Shahryar
|b 10
700 1 _ |a Schoenfelder, Bruno
|0 P:(DE-2719)9001669
|b 11
|u dzne
700 1 _ |a Scamozzi, Maria
|0 P:(DE-2719)9002606
|b 12
|u dzne
700 1 _ |a Zoschke, Katja
|0 P:(DE-2719)2810521
|b 13
|u dzne
700 1 _ |a Canzler, Sebastian
|b 14
700 1 _ |a Hackermüller, Jörg
|b 15
700 1 _ |a Ader, Marius
|b 16
700 1 _ |a Karl, Mike O
|0 P:(DE-2719)2000041
|b 17
|e Last author
|u dzne
773 _ _ |a 10.3389/fncel.2023.1166641
|g Vol. 17, p. 1166641
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2452963-1
|p 1166641
|t Frontiers in cellular neuroscience
|v 17
|y 2023
|x 1662-5102
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|u https://pub.dzne.de/record/265755/files/DZNE-2023-01030.pdf
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x pdfa
|u https://pub.dzne.de/record/265755/files/DZNE-2023-01030.pdf?subformat=pdfa
909 C O |o oai:pub.dzne.de:265755
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p VDB
|p driver
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen
|0 I:(DE-588)1065079516
|k DZNE
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-2719)2810390
910 1 _ |a External Institute
|0 I:(DE-HGF)0
|k Extern
|b 3
|6 P:(DE-2719)2811441
910 1 _ |a External Institute
|0 I:(DE-HGF)0
|k Extern
|b 5
|6 P:(DE-2719)9001836
910 1 _ |a External Institute
|0 I:(DE-HGF)0
|k Extern
|b 6
|6 P:(DE-2719)9001420
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen
|0 I:(DE-588)1065079516
|k DZNE
|b 7
|6 P:(DE-2719)2812103
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen
|0 I:(DE-588)1065079516
|k DZNE
|b 9
|6 P:(DE-2719)2810498
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen
|0 I:(DE-588)1065079516
|k DZNE
|b 11
|6 P:(DE-2719)9001669
910 1 _ |a External Institute
|0 I:(DE-HGF)0
|k Extern
|b 12
|6 P:(DE-2719)9002606
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen
|0 I:(DE-588)1065079516
|k DZNE
|b 13
|6 P:(DE-2719)2810521
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen
|0 I:(DE-588)1065079516
|k DZNE
|b 17
|6 P:(DE-2719)2000041
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Gesundheit
|l Neurodegenerative Diseases
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-350
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-352
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-300
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Disease Mechanisms
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2023
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2023-08-29
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1190
|2 StatID
|b Biological Abstracts
|d 2023-08-29
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ Seal
|d 2021-05-13T10:30:24Z
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ
|d 2021-05-13T10:30:24Z
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2023-08-29
915 _ _ |a Fees
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0700
|2 StatID
|d 2023-08-29
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ : Anonymous peer review
|d 2021-05-13T10:30:24Z
915 _ _ |a Article Processing Charges
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0561
|2 StatID
|d 2023-08-29
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b FRONT CELL NEUROSCI : 2022
|d 2023-10-25
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2023-10-25
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2023-10-25
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0320
|2 StatID
|b PubMed Central
|d 2023-10-25
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2023-10-25
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
|d 2023-10-25
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2023-10-25
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1040
|2 StatID
|b Zoological Record
|d 2023-10-25
915 _ _ |a IF >= 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9905
|2 StatID
|b FRONT CELL NEUROSCI : 2022
|d 2023-10-25
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-2719)1710004
|k AG Karl
|l Retina Regeneration and Degeneration
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-2719)1710004
980 1 _ |a FullTexts


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21