% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@INBOOK{Mattern:266461,
      author       = {Mattern, Hendrik and Lüsebrink, Falk and Speck, Oliver},
      title        = {{H}igh-resolution structural brain imaging},
      volume       = {6},
      publisher    = {Elsevier},
      reportid     = {DZNE-2023-01146},
      series       = {Advances in Magnetic Resonance Technology and Applications},
      pages        = {433 - 448},
      year         = {2022},
      note         = {Missing Journal: = 2666-9099 (import from CrossRef Book
                      Series, Journals: pub.dzne.de)},
      comment      = {Motion Correction in MR - Correction of Position, Motion,
                      and Dynamic Field Changes / Mattern, Hendrik ; : Elsevier,
                      2022, ; ISSN: 26669099 ; ISBN: 9780128244609 ;
                      doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-824460-9.00014-5},
      booktitle     = {Motion Correction in MR - Correction
                       of Position, Motion, and Dynamic Field
                       Changes / Mattern, Hendrik ; :
                       Elsevier, 2022, ; ISSN: 26669099 ;
                       ISBN: 9780128244609 ;
                       doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-824460-9.00014-5},
      abstract     = {At high spatial resolution, unintentional motion due to
                      breathing or slow head drifts is of the same order as the
                      voxel size. Further, higher resolution is prolonging scan
                      sessions, rendering subject motion more likely. Thus, even
                      in compliant subjects, unintentional and physiological
                      motion can induce motion artifacts. Motion compensation or
                      correction is required to prevent inevitable image blurring
                      due to unintentional head motion and to effectively achieve
                      the nominal high resolution desired. This chapter discusses
                      the requirements for and challenges of high-resolution
                      motion correction. Representative state-of-the-art methods
                      and examples of high (< 700 μm) and ultra-high (< 500 μm)
                      resolution MRI of the brain are given, categorized by the
                      tracking modality. The studies shown represent some of the
                      highest resolution human brain in vivo scans acquired to
                      date. Open challenges such as limited SNR and nonrigidity
                      are discussed to highlight further challenges that need to
                      be overcome to narrow the gap toward microscopy.},
      cin          = {AG Speck / AG Reymann},
      cid          = {I:(DE-2719)1340009 / I:(DE-2719)1310005},
      pnm          = {353 - Clinical and Health Care Research (POF4-353)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-353},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)7},
      doi          = {10.1016/B978-0-12-824460-9.00014-5},
      url          = {https://pub.dzne.de/record/266461},
}