% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Wilfling:267056,
author = {Wilfling, Denise and Möhler, Ralph and Berg, Almuth and
Dörner, Jonas and Bartmann, Natascha and Klatt, Thomas and
Meyer, Gabriele and Halek, Margareta and Köpke, Sascha and
Dichter, Martin},
title = {{I}tem distribution, internal consistency and structural
validity of the {G}erman language person-centred climate
questionnaire - staff version ({PCQ}-{G}-{S}): a
cross-sectional study.},
journal = {BMC geriatrics},
volume = {24},
number = {1},
issn = {1471-2318},
address = {London},
publisher = {BioMed Central},
reportid = {DZNE-2024-00065},
pages = {57},
year = {2024},
abstract = {Person-centredness is considered as best practice for
people living with dementia. A frequently used instrument to
assess person-centredness of a care environment is the
Person-centred Climate Questionnaire (PCQ). The
questionnaire comprises of 14 items with the three subscales
a climate of safety, a climate of everydayness and a climate
of community.The aim of the study is to describe the
translation process of the English language Person-centred
Climate Questionnaire (Staff version, Patient version,
Family version) into German language (PCQ-G) and to evaluate
the first psychometric properties of the German language
Person-centred Climate Questionnaire- Staff version
(PCQ-G-S).We conducted a cross-sectional study. The three
versions of the 14-item English PCQ were translated into
German language (PCQ-G) based on the recommendations for
cross-cultural adaption of measures. Item distribution,
internal consistency and structural validity of the
questionnaire were assessed among nursing home staff
(PCQ-G-S). Item distribution was calculated using
descriptive statistics. Structural validity was tested using
principal component analysis (PCA), and internal consistency
was assessed for the resulting subscales using Cronbach's
alpha. Data collection took place from May to September
2021.A total sample of 120 nurses was included in the data
analysis. Nine out of 14 items of the PCQ-G-S demonstrated
acceptable item difficulty, while five times showed a
ceiling effect. The PCA analysis demonstrated a strong
structural validity for a three-factor solution explaining
$68.6\%$ of the total variance. The three subscales
demonstrated a good internal consistency with Cronbach's
alpha scores of 0.8 for each of the subscales.The analysis
of the 14-item German version (PCQ-G-S) showed first
evidence for a strong internal consistency and structural
validity for evaluating staff perceptions of the
person-centredness in German nursing homes. Based on this,
further investigations for scale validity of the PCQ-G
versions should be carried out.},
keywords = {Humans / Cross-Sectional Studies / Patient-Centered Care /
Reproducibility of Results / Language / Surveys and
Questionnaires / Psychometrics / Dementia (Other) /
Instrument (Other) / Nursing homes (Other) /
Person-centeredness (Other) / Psychometric properties
(Other) / Validity (Other)},
cin = {AG Halek},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-2719)1610001},
pnm = {353 - Clinical and Health Care Research (POF4-353)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-353},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:38216870},
pmc = {pmc:PMC10787414},
doi = {10.1186/s12877-023-04528-3},
url = {https://pub.dzne.de/record/267056},
}