% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Saxler:271144,
author = {Saxler, Eva and Schindler, Theresa and Philipsen, Alexandra
and Schulze, Marcel and Lux, Silke},
title = {{T}herapeutic alliance in individual adult psychotherapy: a
systematic review of conceptualizations and measures for
face-to-face- and online-psychotherapy},
journal = {Frontiers in psychology},
volume = {15},
issn = {1664-1078},
address = {Lausanne},
publisher = {Frontiers Research Foundation},
reportid = {DZNE-2024-01012},
pages = {1293851},
year = {2024},
abstract = {The therapeutic alliance (TA) is a robust and
pantheoretical predictor of treatment outcome in
Face-to-Face- (F2F-) and Online-psychotherapy (Online-PT).
Many authors have proposed several conceptualizations of TA,
which are oftentimes operationalized. The resulting
diversity of conceptualizations and measures is presented in
this review.We performed a three-parted literature search
for self-report-instruments of TA in individual, voluntary
F2F-PT with adults (1. utilization of past reviews, 2.
systematic literature search yielding 5,205 articles, 3.
reference lists). Analogously, we conducted a systematic
literature search for instruments of TA in the
Online-setting (yielding 200 articles). Additionally, we
analyzed the content of the instruments qualitatively.A
current overview of 48 instruments for measuring TA (46 for
F2F-PT, 2 for Online-PT) including their conceptual
backgrounds, characteristics and main content aspects is
presented. Most instruments (n = 24) operationalize one or
more theoretical conceptualizations of TA. Other instruments
are adaptation/syntheses of existing measures (n = 14),
based on literature searches (n = 3) or on an empirical
survey (n = 3) and two instruments provide no conceptual
background information. The content of the instruments
mainly focused on the following aspects: 1. Self-disclosure
and authenticity; 2. Agreement; 3. Active participation,
motivation and compliance; 4. Trust and secure attachment;
and 5. Considering needs/abilities/wishes of the patient.
Additionally, a narrative review of various approaches to
conceptualize TA is presented and linked to respective
corresponding instruments.The broad variety of
conceptualizations and measures of TA makes coherent
research on TA difficult. There are conceptual challenges
such as the role of attachment style in TA that remain to be
clarified. The current conceptualizations and measures do
not incorporate the practical experience and expertise of
psychotherapists and patients sufficiently. A
metatheoretical conceptualization and measure of TA based on
an empirical survey of psychotherapists and patients could
address these issues.},
keywords = {conceptualizations (Other) / measurements (Other) /
psychotherapy (Other) / systematic review (Other) /
therapeutic alliance (Other)},
cin = {AG Amin},
ddc = {150},
cid = {I:(DE-2719)1710010},
pnm = {351 - Brain Function (POF4-351)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-351},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:38993343},
pmc = {pmc:PMC11238262},
doi = {10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1293851},
url = {https://pub.dzne.de/record/271144},
}