% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Ladd:272502,
      author       = {Ladd, Mark E and Quick, Harald H and Scheffler, Klaus and
                      Speck, Oliver},
      title        = {{D}esign requirements for human {UHF} magnets from the
                      perspective of {MRI} scientists},
      journal      = {Superconductor science and technology},
      volume       = {37},
      number       = {11},
      issn         = {0953-2048},
      address      = {Bristol},
      publisher    = {IOP Publ.},
      reportid     = {DZNE-2024-01178},
      pages        = {113001},
      year         = {2024},
      abstract     = {The highest magnetic field strength for human-sized
                      magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) currently lies at 11.7
                      tesla. Given the opportunities for enhanced sensitivity and
                      improved data quality at higher static magnetic fields,
                      several initiatives around the world are pursuing the
                      implementation of further human MRI systems at or above 11.7
                      tesla. In general, members of the magnetic resonance (MR)
                      research community are not experts on magnet technology.
                      However, the magnet is the technological heart of any MR
                      system, and the MRI community is challenging the magnet
                      research and design community to fulfill the current
                      engineering gap in implementing large-bore, highly
                      homogeneous and stabile magnets at field strengths that go
                      beyond the performance capability of niobium–titanium. In
                      this article, we present an overview of magnet design for
                      such systems from the perspective of MR scientists. The
                      underlying motivation and need for higher magnetic fields
                      are briefly introduced, and system design considerations for
                      the magnet as well as for the MRI subsystems such as the
                      gradients, the shimming arrangement, and the radiofrequency
                      hardware are presented. Finally, important limitations to
                      higher magnetic fields from physiological considerations are
                      described, operating under the assumption that any
                      engineering or economic barriers to realizing such systems
                      will be overcome.},
      cin          = {AG Speck},
      ddc          = {530},
      cid          = {I:(DE-2719)1340009},
      pnm          = {353 - Clinical and Health Care Research (POF4-353)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-353},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      doi          = {10.1088/1361-6668/ad7d3f},
      url          = {https://pub.dzne.de/record/272502},
}