% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Mertz:272597,
      author       = {Mertz, Marcel and Hetzel, Tatiana and Alex, Karla and
                      Braun, Katharina and Camenzind, Samuel and Dodaro, Rita and
                      Jörgensen, Svea and Linder, Erich and Capas-Peneda, Sara
                      and Reihs, Eva Ingeborg and Tiwari, Vini and Todorović,
                      Zorana and Kahrass, Hannes and Selter, Felicitas},
      title        = {{I}nterdisciplinary {A}nimal {R}esearch
                      {E}thics—{C}hallenges, {O}pportunities, and
                      {P}erspectives},
      journal      = {Animals / Molecular Diversity Preservation International,
                      MDPI},
      volume       = {14},
      number       = {19},
      issn         = {2076-2615},
      address      = {Basel},
      publisher    = {MDPI},
      reportid     = {DZNE-2024-01218},
      pages        = {2896},
      year         = {2024},
      abstract     = {Can nonhuman animals be used for the benefit of humans in a
                      scientifically and morally justified manner and, if yes,
                      how? Based on our own experiences as scholars from various
                      academic backgrounds, we argue that this question can only
                      be answered as an interdisciplinary and international
                      endeavor, considering insights from research ethics and
                      animal ethics as well as scientific and legal aspects. The
                      aim of this article is to contribute to the foundation of
                      the emerging field of animal research ethics. In doing so,
                      we describe the following seven phases of animal research
                      experiments: ethical, legal and social presumptions (phase
                      0), planning (phase I), review (phase II), conduct of
                      experiments (phase III), publication/dissemination (phase
                      IV), further exploitation of results (phase V), and
                      evaluation (phase VI). In total, 20 key ethical, legal, and
                      practical challenges that an ethical framework for the use
                      of animals in research needs to address are identified and
                      analyzed. Finally, we characterize the following four
                      meta-challenges and opportunities associated with animal
                      research ethics as a field: (1) moral pluralism, (2) the
                      integration of views and positions outside the laboratory,
                      (3) international plurality of conduct, standards, and legal
                      norms, and (4) interdisciplinary education.},
      cin          = {AG Simons},
      ddc          = {590},
      cid          = {I:(DE-2719)1110008},
      pnm          = {351 - Brain Function (POF4-351)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-351},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      pubmed       = {pmid:39409845},
      pmc          = {pmc:PMC11475729},
      doi          = {10.3390/ani14192896},
      url          = {https://pub.dzne.de/record/272597},
}