% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Bonev:273924,
author = {Bonev, Boyan and Gonçalo, Castelo-Branco and Chen, Fei and
Codeluppi, Simone and Corces, M Ryan and Fan, Jean and
Heiman, Myriam and Harris, Kenneth and Inoue, Fumitaka and
Kellis, Manolis and Levine, Ariel and Lotfollahi, Mo and
Luo, Chongyuan and Maynard, Kristen R and Nitzan, Mor and
Ramani, Vijay and Satijia, Rahul and Schirmer, Lucas and
Shen, Yin and Sun, Na and Green, Gilad S and Theis, Fabian
and Wang, Xiao and Welch, Joshua D and Gokce, Ozgun and
Konopka, Genevieve and Liddelow, Shane and Macosko, Evan and
Bayraktar, Omer and Habib, Naomi and Nowakowski, Tomasz J},
title = {{O}pportunities and challenges of single-cell and spatially
resolved genomics methods for neuroscience discovery.},
journal = {Nature neuroscience},
volume = {27},
number = {12},
issn = {1097-6256},
address = {New York, NY},
publisher = {Nature America},
reportid = {DZNE-2024-01398},
pages = {2292 - 2309},
year = {2024},
abstract = {Over the past decade, single-cell genomics technologies
have allowed scalable profiling of cell-type-specific
features, which has substantially increased our ability to
study cellular diversity and transcriptional programs in
heterogeneous tissues. Yet our understanding of mechanisms
of gene regulation or the rules that govern interactions
between cell types is still limited. The advent of new
computational pipelines and technologies, such as
single-cell epigenomics and spatially resolved
transcriptomics, has created opportunities to explore two
new axes of biological variation: cell-intrinsic regulation
of cell states and expression programs and interactions
between cells. Here, we summarize the most promising and
robust technologies in these areas, discuss their strengths
and limitations and discuss key computational approaches for
analysis of these complex datasets. We highlight how data
sharing and integration, documentation, visualization and
benchmarking of results contribute to transparency,
reproducibility, collaboration and democratization in
neuroscience, and discuss needs and opportunities for future
technology development and analysis.},
keywords = {Single-Cell Analysis: methods / Humans / Genomics: methods
/ Neurosciences: methods / Animals / Epigenomics: methods},
cin = {AG Gokce},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-2719)1013041},
pnm = {351 - Brain Function (POF4-351)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-351},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:39627587},
doi = {10.1038/s41593-024-01806-0},
url = {https://pub.dzne.de/record/273924},
}