% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Payonk:273941,
author = {Payonk, Jan Philipp and Bathel, Henning and Arbeiter, Nils
and Kober, Maria and Fauser, Mareike and Storch, Alexander
and van Rienen, Ursula and Zimmermann, Julius},
title = {{I}mproving computational models of deep brain stimulation
through experimental calibration.},
journal = {Journal of neuroscience methods},
volume = {414},
issn = {0165-0270},
address = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
publisher = {Elsevier Science},
reportid = {DZNE-2024-01415},
pages = {110320},
year = {2025},
abstract = {Deep brain stimulation has become a well-established
clinical tool to treat movement disorders. Nevertheless, the
knowledge of processes initiated by the stimulation remains
limited. To address this knowledge gap, computational models
are developed to gain deeper insight. However, their
predictive power remains constrained by model uncertainties
and a lack of validation and calibration.Exemplified with
rodent microelectrodes, we present a workflow for validating
electrode model geometry using microscopy and impedance
spectroscopy in vitro before implantation. We address
uncertainties in the tissue distribution and dielectric
properties and outline a concept for calibrating the
computational model based on in vivo impedance spectroscopy
measurements.The standard deviation of the volume of tissue
activated across the 18 characterized electrodes was
approximately $32.93\%,$ underscoring the importance of
electrode characterization. Thus, the workflow significantly
enhances the model predictions' credibility of neural
activation exemplified in a rodent model.Computational
models are frequently employed without validation or
calibration, relying instead on manufacturers'
specifications. Our approach provides an accessible method
to obtain a validated and calibrated electrode geometry,
which significantly enhances the reliability of the
computational model that relies on this electrode.By
reducing the uncertainties of the model, the accuracy in
predicting neural activation is increased. The entire
workflow is realized in open-source software, making it
adaptable for other use cases, such as deep brain
stimulation in humans. Additionally, the framework allows
for the integration of further experiments, enabling live
updates and refinements to computational models.},
keywords = {Deep Brain Stimulation: methods / Deep Brain Stimulation:
standards / Animals / Calibration / Computer Simulation /
Microelectrodes / Rats / Dielectric Spectroscopy: methods /
Electrodes, Implanted: standards / Male / Brain: physiology
/ Models, Neurological / Computational modeling (Other) /
Deep brain stimulation (Other) / Dielectric properties
(Other) / Encapsulation tissue (Other) / Impedance
spectroscopy (Other) / Uncertainty quantification (Other)},
cin = {AG Storch},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-2719)5000014},
pnm = {353 - Clinical and Health Care Research (POF4-353)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-353},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:39549963},
doi = {10.1016/j.jneumeth.2024.110320},
url = {https://pub.dzne.de/record/273941},
}