Home > Publications Database > Artificial T1-Weighted Postcontrast Brain MRI: A Deep Learning Method for Contrast Signal Extraction. > print |
001 | 274031 | ||
005 | 20250411100000.0 | ||
024 | 7 | _ | |a 10.1097/RLI.0000000000001107 |2 doi |
024 | 7 | _ | |a pmid:39074258 |2 pmid |
024 | 7 | _ | |a 0020-9996 |2 ISSN |
024 | 7 | _ | |a 1536-0210 |2 ISSN |
037 | _ | _ | |a DZNE-2025-00012 |
041 | _ | _ | |a English |
082 | _ | _ | |a 610 |
100 | 1 | _ | |a Haase, Robert |0 P:(DE-2719)9001860 |b 0 |
245 | _ | _ | |a Artificial T1-Weighted Postcontrast Brain MRI: A Deep Learning Method for Contrast Signal Extraction. |
260 | _ | _ | |a [Erscheinungsort nicht ermittelbar] |c 2025 |b Ovid |
336 | 7 | _ | |a article |2 DRIVER |
336 | 7 | _ | |a Output Types/Journal article |2 DataCite |
336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |b journal |m journal |0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16 |s 1744358340_16420 |2 PUB:(DE-HGF) |
336 | 7 | _ | |a ARTICLE |2 BibTeX |
336 | 7 | _ | |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE |2 ORCID |
336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |0 0 |2 EndNote |
520 | _ | _ | |a Reducing gadolinium-based contrast agents to lower costs, the environmental impact of gadolinium-containing wastewater, and patient exposure is still an unresolved issue. Published methods have never been compared. The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of 2 reimplemented state-of-the-art deep learning methods (settings A and B) and a proposed method for contrast signal extraction (setting C) to synthesize artificial T1-weighted full-dose images from corresponding noncontrast and low-dose images.In this prospective study, 213 participants received magnetic resonance imaging of the brain between August and October 2021 including low-dose (0.02 mmol/kg) and full-dose images (0.1 mmol/kg). Fifty participants were randomly set aside as test set before training (mean age ± SD, 52.6 ± 15.3 years; 30 men). Artificial and true full-dose images were compared using a reader-based study. Two readers noted all false-positive lesions and scored the overall interchangeability in regard to the clinical conclusion. Using a 5-point Likert scale (0 being the worst), they scored the contrast enhancement of each lesion and its conformity to the respective reference in the true image.The average counts of false-positives per participant were 0.33 ± 0.93, 0.07 ± 0.33, and 0.05 ± 0.22 for settings A-C, respectively. Setting C showed a significantly higher proportion of scans scored as fully or mostly interchangeable (70/100) than settings A (40/100, P < 0.001) and B (57/100, P < 0.001), and generated the smallest mean enhancement reduction of scored lesions (-0.50 ± 0.55) compared with the true images (setting A: -1.10 ± 0.98; setting B: -0.91 ± 0.67, both P < 0.001). The average scores of conformity of the lesion were 1.75 ± 1.07, 2.19 ± 1.04, and 2.48 ± 0.91 for settings A-C, respectively, with significant differences among all settings (all P < 0.001).The proposed method for contrast signal extraction showed significant improvements in synthesizing postcontrast images. A relevant proportion of images showing inadequate interchangeability with the reference remains at this dosage. |
536 | _ | _ | |a 353 - Clinical and Health Care Research (POF4-353) |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-353 |c POF4-353 |f POF IV |x 0 |
588 | _ | _ | |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed, , Journals: pub.dzne.de |
650 | _ | 7 | |a Contrast Media |2 NLM Chemicals |
650 | _ | 2 | |a Humans |2 MeSH |
650 | _ | 2 | |a Deep Learning |2 MeSH |
650 | _ | 2 | |a Male |2 MeSH |
650 | _ | 2 | |a Contrast Media |2 MeSH |
650 | _ | 2 | |a Female |2 MeSH |
650 | _ | 2 | |a Prospective Studies |2 MeSH |
650 | _ | 2 | |a Magnetic Resonance Imaging: methods |2 MeSH |
650 | _ | 2 | |a Middle Aged |2 MeSH |
650 | _ | 2 | |a Brain: diagnostic imaging |2 MeSH |
650 | _ | 2 | |a Adult |2 MeSH |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Pinetz, Thomas |b 1 |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Kobler, Erich |b 2 |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Bendella, Zeynep |0 P:(DE-2719)9003165 |b 3 |u dzne |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Gronemann, Christian |b 4 |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Paech, Daniel |0 P:(DE-2719)9001705 |b 5 |u dzne |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Radbruch, Alexander |0 P:(DE-2719)9001861 |b 6 |u dzne |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Effland, Alexander |0 P:(DE-2719)9002732 |b 7 |u dzne |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Deike-Hofmann, Katerina |0 P:(DE-2719)9001745 |b 8 |e Last author |
773 | _ | _ | |a 10.1097/RLI.0000000000001107 |g Vol. 60, no. 2 |0 PERI:(DE-600)2041543-6 |n 2 |p 105 - 113 |t Investigative radiology |v 60 |y 2025 |x 0020-9996 |
856 | 4 | _ | |u https://pub.dzne.de/record/274031/files/DZNE-2025-00012%20SUP.doc |
856 | 4 | _ | |u https://pub.dzne.de/record/274031/files/DZNE-2025-00012%20SUP.docx |
856 | 4 | _ | |u https://pub.dzne.de/record/274031/files/DZNE-2025-00012%20SUP.odt |
856 | 4 | _ | |u https://pub.dzne.de/record/274031/files/DZNE-2025-00012%20SUP.pdf |
856 | 4 | _ | |u https://pub.dzne.de/record/274031/files/DZNE-2025-00012_Restricted.pdf |
856 | 4 | _ | |u https://pub.dzne.de/record/274031/files/DZNE-2025-00012_Restricted.pdf?subformat=pdfa |x pdfa |
909 | C | O | |p VDB |o oai:pub.dzne.de:274031 |
910 | 1 | _ | |a External Institute |0 I:(DE-HGF)0 |k Extern |b 3 |6 P:(DE-2719)9003165 |
910 | 1 | _ | |a External Institute |0 I:(DE-HGF)0 |k Extern |b 5 |6 P:(DE-2719)9001705 |
910 | 1 | _ | |a Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen |0 I:(DE-588)1065079516 |k DZNE |b 6 |6 P:(DE-2719)9001861 |
910 | 1 | _ | |a External Institute |0 I:(DE-HGF)0 |k Extern |b 7 |6 P:(DE-2719)9002732 |
910 | 1 | _ | |a Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen |0 I:(DE-588)1065079516 |k DZNE |b 8 |6 P:(DE-2719)9001745 |
913 | 1 | _ | |a DE-HGF |b Gesundheit |l Neurodegenerative Diseases |1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-350 |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-353 |3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4 |2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-300 |4 G:(DE-HGF)POF |v Clinical and Health Care Research |x 0 |
914 | 1 | _ | |y 2025 |
915 | _ | _ | |a Allianz-Lizenz |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0410 |2 StatID |d 2023-10-24 |w ger |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300 |2 StatID |b Medline |d 2023-10-24 |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199 |2 StatID |b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List |d 2023-10-24 |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050 |2 StatID |b BIOSIS Previews |d 2023-10-24 |
915 | _ | _ | |a WoS |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113 |2 StatID |b Science Citation Index Expanded |d 2023-10-24 |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150 |2 StatID |b Web of Science Core Collection |d 2023-10-24 |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1030 |2 StatID |b Current Contents - Life Sciences |d 2023-10-24 |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1190 |2 StatID |b Biological Abstracts |d 2023-10-24 |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160 |2 StatID |b Essential Science Indicators |d 2023-10-24 |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1110 |2 StatID |b Current Contents - Clinical Medicine |d 2023-10-24 |
915 | _ | _ | |a JCR |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100 |2 StatID |b INVEST RADIOL : 2022 |d 2023-10-24 |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200 |2 StatID |b SCOPUS |d 2023-10-24 |
915 | _ | _ | |a IF >= 5 |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9905 |2 StatID |b INVEST RADIOL : 2022 |d 2023-10-24 |
920 | 1 | _ | |0 I:(DE-2719)5000075 |k AG Radbruch |l Clinical Neuroimaging |x 0 |
980 | _ | _ | |a journal |
980 | _ | _ | |a VDB |
980 | _ | _ | |a I:(DE-2719)5000075 |
980 | _ | _ | |a UNRESTRICTED |
Library | Collection | CLSMajor | CLSMinor | Language | Author |
---|