001     274065
005     20250120165732.0
024 7 _ |a 10.2967/jnumed.124.268119
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a pmid:39542700
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a pmc:PMC11705786
|2 pmc
024 7 _ |a 0097-9058
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 0022-3123
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 0161-5505
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1535-5667
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 2159-662X
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a altmetric:170435678
|2 altmetric
037 _ _ |a DZNE-2025-00046
041 _ _ |a English
082 _ _ |a 610
100 1 _ |a Collij, Lyduine E
|b 0
245 _ _ |a Quantification Supports Amyloid PET Visual Assessment of Challenging Cases: Results from the AMYPAD Diagnostic and Patient Management Study.
260 _ _ |a New York, NY
|c 2025
|b Soc.
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1736940599_5558
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Several studies have demonstrated strong agreement between routine clinical visual assessment and quantification, suggesting that quantification approaches could support assessment by less experienced readers or in challenging cases. However, all studies to date have implemented a retrospective case collection, and challenging cases were generally underrepresented. Methods: We included all participants (n = 741) from the AMYPAD diagnostic and patient management study with available baseline amyloid PET quantification. Quantification was done with the PET-only AmyPype pipeline, providing global Centiloid and regional z scores. Visual assessment was performed by local readers for the entire cohort. From the total cohort, we selected a subsample of 85 cases for which the amyloid status based on the local reader's visual assessment and the Centiloid classification (cutoff = 21) was discordant or that were assessed with low confidence (i.e., ≤3 on a 5-point scale) by the local reader. In addition, concordant negative (n = 8) and positive (n = 8) scans across tracers were selected. In this sample (n = 101 cases; [18F]flutemetamol, n = 48; [18F]florbetaben, n = 53), the visual assessments and corresponding confidence by 5 certified independent central readers were captured before and after disclosure of the quantification results. Results: For the whole AMYPAD diagnostic and patient management study cohort, overall assessment by local readers highly agreed with Centiloid status (κ = 0.85, 92.3% agreement). This was consistently observed within disease stages (subjective cognitive decline-plus, κ = 0.82, 92.3% agreement; mild cognitive impairment, κ = 0.80, 89.8% agreement; dementia, κ = 0.87, 94.6% agreement). Across all central reader assessments in the challenging subsample, quantification of global Centiloid and regional z scores was considered supportive of visual reads in 70.3% and 49.3% of assessments, respectively. After disclosure of the quantitative results, we observed improvement in concordance across the 5 readers (baseline κ = 0.65, 65.3% agreement; κ after disclosure = 0.74, 73.3% agreement) and a significant increase in reader confidence (baseline mean (M) = 4.0 vs. M after disclosure = 4.34, Wilcoxon statistic (W) = 101,056, P < 0.001). Conclusion: In this clinical study enriched for challenging amyloid PET cases, we demonstrate the value of quantification to support visual assessment. After disclosure, both interreader agreement and confidence showed significant improvement. These results are important considering the arrival of antiamyloid therapies, which used the Centiloid metric for trial inclusion and target engagement. Moreover, quantification could support determination of amyloid-β status with high certainty, an important factor for treatment initiation.
536 _ _ |a 353 - Clinical and Health Care Research (POF4-353)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-353
|c POF4-353
|f POF IV
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed, , Journals: pub.dzne.de
650 _ 7 |a Alzheimer
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a Centiloid quantification
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a amyloid PET
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a molecular imaging
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a neurology
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a visual read
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a Amyloid
|2 NLM Chemicals
650 _ 2 |a Humans
|2 MeSH
650 _ 2 |a Positron-Emission Tomography
|2 MeSH
650 _ 2 |a Male
|2 MeSH
650 _ 2 |a Female
|2 MeSH
650 _ 2 |a Aged
|2 MeSH
650 _ 2 |a Amyloid: metabolism
|2 MeSH
650 _ 2 |a Retrospective Studies
|2 MeSH
650 _ 2 |a Alzheimer Disease: diagnostic imaging
|2 MeSH
650 _ 2 |a Middle Aged
|2 MeSH
650 _ 2 |a Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
|2 MeSH
700 1 _ |a Bischof, Gérard N
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Altomare, Daniele
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Bader, Ilse
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Battle, Mark
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Vállez García, David
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Lopes Alves, Isadora
|b 6
700 1 _ |a Wolz, Robin
|b 7
700 1 _ |a Gismondi, Rossella
|b 8
700 1 _ |a Stephens, Andrew
|b 9
700 1 _ |a Walker, Zuzana
|b 10
700 1 _ |a Scheltens, Philip
|b 11
700 1 _ |a Nordberg, Agneta
|b 12
700 1 _ |a Gispert, Juan Domingo
|b 13
700 1 _ |a Drzezga, Alexander
|0 P:(DE-2719)2811239
|b 14
|u dzne
700 1 _ |a Perissinotti, Andrés
|b 15
700 1 _ |a Morbelli, Silvia
|b 16
700 1 _ |a Buckley, Christopher
|b 17
700 1 _ |a Garibotto, Valentina
|b 18
700 1 _ |a Frisoni, Giovanni B
|b 19
700 1 _ |a Farrar, Gill
|b 20
700 1 _ |a Barkhof, Frederik
|b 21
700 1 _ |a Consortium, AMYPAD
|b 22
|e Collaboration Author
773 _ _ |a 10.2967/jnumed.124.268119
|g Vol. 66, no. 1, p. 110 - 116
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2040222-3
|n 1
|p 110 - 116
|t Journal of nuclear medicine
|v 66
|y 2025
|x 0097-9058
856 4 _ |u https://pub.dzne.de/record/274065/files/DZNE-2025-00046%20SUP.pdf
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|u https://pub.dzne.de/record/274065/files/DZNE-2025-00046.pdf
856 4 _ |x pdfa
|u https://pub.dzne.de/record/274065/files/DZNE-2025-00046%20SUP.pdf?subformat=pdfa
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x pdfa
|u https://pub.dzne.de/record/274065/files/DZNE-2025-00046.pdf?subformat=pdfa
909 C O |o oai:pub.dzne.de:274065
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p VDB
|p driver
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen
|0 I:(DE-588)1065079516
|k DZNE
|b 14
|6 P:(DE-2719)2811239
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Gesundheit
|l Neurodegenerative Diseases
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-350
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-353
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-300
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Clinical and Health Care Research
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2025
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2023-10-24
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2023-10-24
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
|d 2023-10-24
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1190
|2 StatID
|b Biological Abstracts
|d 2023-10-24
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b J NUCL MED : 2022
|d 2023-10-24
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2023-10-24
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1030
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Life Sciences
|d 2023-10-24
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2023-10-24
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1110
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Clinical Medicine
|d 2023-10-24
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a IF >= 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9905
|2 StatID
|b J NUCL MED : 2022
|d 2023-10-24
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2023-10-24
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0320
|2 StatID
|b PubMed Central
|d 2023-10-24
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2023-10-24
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-2719)1011202
|k AG Boecker
|l Positron Emissions Tomography (PET)
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-2719)1011202
980 1 _ |a FullTexts


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21