% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Blotenberg:276779,
author = {Blotenberg, Iris and Boekholt, Melanie and Lieberknecht,
Nils and Säring, Paula and Thyrian, Jochen René},
title = {{A}cceptance of {U}nsupervised {A}pp-{B}ased {C}ognitive
{A}ssessment in {O}utpatient {C}are: {A}n {I}mplementation
{S}tudy.},
journal = {JMIR formative research},
volume = {9},
issn = {2561-326X},
address = {Toronto},
publisher = {JMIR Publications},
reportid = {DZNE-2025-00318},
pages = {e62706},
year = {2025},
abstract = {The use of unsupervised digital cognitive assessments
provides considerable opportunities for early and
comprehensive testing for Alzheimer disease, minimizing the
demand on time and personnel resources in medical practices.
However, the acceptance within health care has yet to be
assessed.In this implementation study, the acceptance of an
app-based, repeated cognitive assessment for early symptoms
of Alzheimer disease in the outpatient care setting from
both physicians' and patients' perspectives was examined.In
total, 15 primary care practices participated, where
patients with self- or relative-reported memory problems
could be prescribed an app (neotivCare app [neotiv GmbH])
for comprehensive cognitive testing. Patients used the app
to test their episodic memory function weekly for 12 weeks
at home. After the testing period and the final
consultation, physicians and patients received
questionnaires to assess the app's acceptance.We received
completed questionnaires from physicians for 45 patients. In
addition, we received 45 completed questionnaires from the
patients themselves. The physicians reported that, for most
patients, the app supported their decision-making in the
diagnostic process (26/45, $58\%).$ In addition, most
physicians found the app's information dependable (34/45,
$76\%)$ and felt more certain in their decisions (38/45,
$84\%).$ From the patients' perspective, a majority felt
thoroughly tested (34/45, $76\%),$ and only a few considered
the time commitment for the cognitive tests to be too
burdensome (7/45, $16\%).$ Furthermore, despite the weekly
cognitive testing and the lengthy 12-week testing period, a
majority of patients participated in all tests (39/54,
$72\%).Our$ results indicate a high level of acceptance by
physicians and patients, suggesting significant potential
for the implementation of unsupervised digital cognitive
assessments into routine health care. In the future,
acceptance should be assessed in large-scale studies, with a
particular focus on the impact on health care delivery and
patient outcomes.},
keywords = {Humans / Female / Male / Mobile Applications / Aged /
Ambulatory Care / Alzheimer Disease: diagnosis / Alzheimer
Disease: psychology / Surveys and Questionnaires / Middle
Aged / Aged, 80 and over / Patient Acceptance of Health
Care: psychology / Primary Health Care / Alzheimer disease
(Other) / cognition (Other) / computerized assessment
(Other) / dementia (Other) / digital assessment (Other) /
digital cognitive biomarkers (Other) / digital platform
(Other) / home-based assessment (Other) / mild cognitive
impairment (Other) / mobile phone (Other)},
cin = {AG Thyrian},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-2719)1510800},
pnm = {353 - Clinical and Health Care Research (POF4-353)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-353},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:39946414},
doi = {10.2196/62706},
url = {https://pub.dzne.de/record/276779},
}