% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Wegner:277551,
author = {Wegner, Philipp and Fröhlich, Holger and Madan, Sumit},
title = {{E}valuating knowledge fusion models on detecting adverse
drug events in text.},
journal = {PLOS digital health},
volume = {4},
number = {3},
issn = {2767-3170},
address = {San Francisco, CA},
publisher = {PLoS},
reportid = {DZNE-2025-00440},
pages = {e0000468},
year = {2025},
abstract = {Detecting adverse drug events (ADE) of drugs that are
already available on the market is an essential part of the
pharmacovigilance work conducted by both medical regulatory
bodies and the pharmaceutical industry. Concerns regarding
drug safety and economic interests serve as motivating
factors for the efforts to identify ADEs. Hereby, social
media platforms play an important role as a valuable source
of reports on ADEs, particularly through collecting posts
discussing adverse events associated with specific drugs. We
aim with our study to assess the effectiveness of knowledge
fusion approaches in combination with transformer-based NLP
models to extract ADE mentions from diverse datasets, for
instance, texts from Twitter, websites like askapatient.com,
and drug labels. The extraction task is formulated as a
named entity recognition (NER) problem. The proposed
methodology involves applying fusion learning methods to
enhance the performance of transformer-based language models
with additional contextual knowledge from ontologies or
knowledge graphs. Additionally, the study introduces a
multi-modal architecture that combines transformer-based
language models with graph attention networks (GAT) to
identify ADE spans in textual data. A multi-modality model
consisting of the ERNIE model with knowledge on drugs
reached an F1-score of $71.84\%$ on CADEC corpus.
Additionally, a combination of a graph attention network
with BERT resulted in an F1-score of $65.16\%$ on SMM4H
corpus. Impressively, the same model achieved an F1-score of
$72.50\%$ on the PsyTAR corpus, $79.54\%$ on the ADE corpus,
and $94.15\%$ on the TAC corpus. Except for the CADEC
corpus, the knowledge fusion models consistently
outperformed the baseline model, BERT. Our study
demonstrates the significance of context knowledge in
improving the performance of knowledge fusion models for
detecting ADEs from various types of textual data.},
cin = {Clinical Research Platform (CRP)},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-2719)1011401},
pnm = {353 - Clinical and Health Care Research (POF4-353)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-353},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:40100877},
doi = {10.1371/journal.pdig.0000468},
url = {https://pub.dzne.de/record/277551},
}