000278918 001__ 278918
000278918 005__ 20250605100736.0
000278918 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088738
000278918 0247_ $$2pmid$$apmid:40404320
000278918 0247_ $$2pmc$$apmc:PMC12104937
000278918 037__ $$aDZNE-2025-00644
000278918 041__ $$aEnglish
000278918 082__ $$a610
000278918 1001_ $$0P:(DE-2719)9001870$$aBlotenberg, Iris$$b0$$eFirst author
000278918 245__ $$aAssessment of the validity of the Resilience and Strain Questionnaire in Caregivers of People with Dementia (ResQ-Care-Dem): a cross-sectional survey study.
000278918 260__ $$aLondon$$bBMJ Publishing Group$$c2025
000278918 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000278918 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000278918 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1749040247_5050
000278918 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000278918 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000278918 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000278918 520__ $$aThe aim of the present study was to examine the reliability and validity (structural and convergent) of the Resilience and Strain Questionnaire in Caregivers of People with Dementia (ResQ-Care-Dem).Cross-sectional survey study.Online survey in Germany.The ResQ-Care-Dem was completed by 243 informal caregivers of people with dementia (Mage=59.7 years, SD=10.9, 84.8% female).The ResQ-Care-Dem consists of four scales: two resilience scales (psychological aspects and social aspects of resilience) and two burden scales (interpersonal burden and general burden). The reliability of the two resilience and two burden scales was assessed using Cronbach's alpha as a measure of internal consistency. Structural validity was examined using a principal axis factor analysis. Convergent validity was assessed by Pearson's correlations with the Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI-7), the Caregiver Self-Efficacy Scale (CES-8) and the Gain in Alzheimer Care Instrument (GAIN).The ResQ-Care-Dem scales' internal consistencies ranged between 0.65 and 0.81. The factorial structure could partly be confirmed, with the items of the four scales primarily loading on four factors. The burden scales demonstrated high and positive correlations with the score for caregiver burden (ZBI-7, r=0.51 - 0.55) and small to high, negative correlations with the scores for caregiver self-efficacy (CES-8, r=-0.52 -0.56) and gains from caregiving (GAIN, r=-0.21 -0.22), supporting construct validity of the scales. The resilience scales showed small to high positive correlations with the scores for caregiver self-efficacy (CES-8, r=0.50 - 0.57) and gains from caregiving (GAIN, r=0.27 - 0.50), as well as moderate negative correlations with the caregiver burden score (ZBI-7, r=-0.45 -0.50), providing evidence for the scales' construct validity.The reliability and structural validity of the ResQ-Care-Dem were partially confirmed. Evidence supporting its convergent validity suggests that the questionnaire has potential as a tool for assessing caregiver burden and resilience factors among informal caregivers of people with dementia. While these findings indicate potential practical applicability, future studies should investigate its performance in real-world settings and assess changes over time (eg, responsiveness) in longitudinal studies.
000278918 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-353$$a353 - Clinical and Health Care Research (POF4-353)$$cPOF4-353$$fPOF IV$$x0
000278918 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed, , Journals: pub.dzne.de
000278918 650_7 $$2Other$$aCaregiver Burden
000278918 650_7 $$2Other$$aCaregivers
000278918 650_7 $$2Other$$aDementia
000278918 650_7 $$2Other$$aPsychometrics
000278918 650_7 $$2Other$$aStress, Psychological
000278918 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aHumans
000278918 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aCross-Sectional Studies
000278918 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aFemale
000278918 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aCaregivers: psychology
000278918 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aMale
000278918 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aDementia: nursing
000278918 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aMiddle Aged
000278918 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aResilience, Psychological
000278918 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aSurveys and Questionnaires: standards
000278918 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aReproducibility of Results
000278918 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aAged
000278918 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aGermany
000278918 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aPsychometrics
000278918 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aAdult
000278918 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aStress, Psychological: psychology
000278918 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aSelf Efficacy
000278918 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aCost of Illness
000278918 7001_ $$aWuttke, Alexandra$$b1
000278918 7001_ $$0P:(DE-2719)9000494$$aBoekholt, Melanie$$b2$$udzne
000278918 7001_ $$0P:(DE-2719)2700724$$aKöhler, Kerstin$$b3
000278918 7001_ $$0P:(DE-2719)2259175$$aHolle, Bernhard$$b4
000278918 7001_ $$0P:(DE-2719)2290613$$aThyrian, Jochen René$$b5$$eLast author
000278918 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2599832-8$$a10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088738$$gVol. 15, no. 5, p. e088738 -$$n5$$pe088738$$tBMJ open$$v15$$x2044-6055$$y2025
000278918 8564_ $$uhttps://pub.dzne.de/record/278918/files/DZNE-2025-00644.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000278918 8564_ $$uhttps://pub.dzne.de/record/278918/files/DZNE-2025-00644.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yOpenAccess
000278918 909CO $$ooai:pub.dzne.de:278918$$popenaire$$popen_access$$pVDB$$pdriver$$pdnbdelivery
000278918 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588)1065079516$$6P:(DE-2719)9001870$$aDeutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen$$b0$$kDZNE
000278918 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588)1065079516$$6P:(DE-2719)9000494$$aDeutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen$$b2$$kDZNE
000278918 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588)1065079516$$6P:(DE-2719)2700724$$aDeutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen$$b3$$kDZNE
000278918 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588)1065079516$$6P:(DE-2719)2259175$$aDeutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen$$b4$$kDZNE
000278918 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588)1065079516$$6P:(DE-2719)2290613$$aDeutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen$$b5$$kDZNE
000278918 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-353$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF4-350$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF4-300$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF4$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bGesundheit$$lNeurodegenerative Diseases$$vClinical and Health Care Research$$x0
000278918 9141_ $$y2025
000278918 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS$$d2024-12-19
000278918 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0160$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEssential Science Indicators$$d2024-12-19
000278918 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bBMJ OPEN : 2022$$d2024-12-19
000278918 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBYNC4$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial CC BY-NC 4.0
000278918 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0501$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ Seal$$d2024-01-24T13:10:16Z
000278918 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0500$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ$$d2024-01-24T13:10:16Z
000278918 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0113$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded$$d2024-12-19
000278918 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0700$$2StatID$$aFees$$d2024-12-19
000278918 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection$$d2024-12-19
000278918 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5$$d2024-12-19
000278918 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000278918 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bDOAJ : Open peer review$$d2024-01-24T13:10:16Z
000278918 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0561$$2StatID$$aArticle Processing Charges$$d2024-12-19
000278918 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline$$d2024-12-19
000278918 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List$$d2024-12-19
000278918 9201_ $$0I:(DE-2719)1510800$$kAG Thyrian$$lInterventional Health Care Research (IHCR)$$x0
000278918 9201_ $$0I:(DE-2719)1610002$$kAG Holle$$lCare Structures$$x1
000278918 980__ $$ajournal
000278918 980__ $$aVDB
000278918 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000278918 980__ $$aI:(DE-2719)1510800
000278918 980__ $$aI:(DE-2719)1610002
000278918 9801_ $$aFullTexts