% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Labott:279887,
author = {Labott, Berit K and Herold, Fabian and Langhans, Corinna
and Halfpaap, Nicole and Grässler, Bernhard and Hökelmann,
Anita and Müller, Notger G and Hamacher, Daniel},
title = {{M}inimum toe clearance variability in older adults with
mild cognitive impairment: {D}ifferences to healthy controls
and effects of a dance intervention.},
journal = {Gait $\&$ posture},
volume = {121},
issn = {0966-6362},
address = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
publisher = {Elsevier Science},
reportid = {DZNE-2025-00854},
pages = {101 - 107},
year = {2025},
abstract = {Falls in older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI)
are a major health issue. For healthy individuals, higher
variability in minimum toe clearance (MTC) during gait is
associated with the risk of tripping-related falls and dance
intervention reduces MTC variability. Such empirical
evidence is lacking for individuals with MCI.We aimed to
assess differences in MTC variability between healthy older
adults and older adults with MCI. Furthermore, we analysed
the effects of a six-month dance intervention on MTC
variability in older adults with MCI.We recruited
community-dwelling cognitively healthy control participants
(n = 34) and participants with MCI (n = 55). All
participants underwent gait assessment using inertial
sensors. In a cohort study, MTC variability of healthy vs.
MCI participants was compared using Welch's t-test. There
were no significant differences in the participant's
characteristics except for cognitive performance. In a
randomised controlled trial, participants with MCI were
randomly allocated to either an intervention (IG, n = 27) or
a passive control group (CG, n = 28). IG was required to
attend a twice-weekly 90-minute dance program for six
months. After six months, the gait assessment was repeated
in both groups of MCI participants, and the effect of the
dance intervention on MTC variability was assessed using
2-level random intercept models. Additionally, the mean MTC
was analysed in a secondary analysis.Adults with MCI
exhibited a significantly higher MTC variability compared to
healthy adults (p = .016, d = 0.53), but no difference was
found in the mean MTC (p = .980, d < 0.01). The dance
intervention did not improve either MTC variability (p =
.182) or mean MTC (p = .742).The higher MTC variability in
older adults with MCI compared to healthy controls may
contribute to their higher fall risk. Future studies should
investigate the effects of an individually tailored dance
intervention, and other intervention approaches on MTC
variability and fall risk.},
keywords = {Humans / Cognitive Dysfunction: physiopathology / Cognitive
Dysfunction: rehabilitation / Aged / Male / Female / Dance
Therapy: methods / Toes: physiopathology / Toes: physiology
/ Gait: physiology / Accidental Falls: prevention $\&$
control / Case-Control Studies / Aged, 80 and over /
Dancing: physiology / Postural Balance: physiology /
Geriatrics (Other) / Inertial sensor (Other) / Locomotion
(Other) / Minimum foot clearance (Other) / Minor
neurocognitive disorder (Other) / Primary prevention
(Other)},
cin = {AG Müller},
ddc = {796},
cid = {I:(DE-2719)1310003},
pnm = {353 - Clinical and Health Care Research (POF4-353)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-353},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:40339306},
doi = {10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.04.033},
url = {https://pub.dzne.de/record/279887},
}