% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Sanftenberg:280231,
author = {Sanftenberg, Linda and Kosilek, Robert Philipp and
Birnberger, Lorenz and Schillok, Hannah and Wittmann, Felix
and Luppa, Melanie and Blawert, Anne and Boekholt, Melanie
and Brettschneider, Christian and König, Hans-Helmut and
Bauer, Alexander and Weise, Solveig and Frese, Thomas and
Kaduszkiewicz, Hanna and Döhring, Juliane and Escales,
Catharina and Thyrian, Jochen René and Wiese, Birgitt and
Riedel-Heller, Steffi G and Gensichen, Jochen},
title = {{T}wo sides of the same coin: recruitment performance and
perceived workload in primary care trials-insights from the
{A}ge{W}ell.de study.},
journal = {BMC primary care},
volume = {26},
number = {1},
issn = {1471-2296},
address = {London},
publisher = {BioMed Central},
reportid = {DZNE-2025-00909},
pages = {243},
year = {2025},
abstract = {Recruitment through general practitioners (GPs) is a key
challenge in primary care trials. Understanding how
individual, practice, and regional characteristics affect
recruitment and perceived workload could help optimize
participation strategies. This study aims to identify
barriers and facilitators to patient recruitment within the
AgeWell.de dementia prevention trial.We analysed publicly
available data on GPs participating in the AgeWell.de trial,
including their sociodemographic characteristics, practice
structures, and socioeconomic indicators of their practice
locations, alongside recruitment and survey data. We used
correlation analysis and uni- and multivariable regression
models to explore determinants of study engagement in terms
of recruitment performance and perceived workload.Among 120
participating GPs, a total of 1,173 patients were recruited,
though contributions varied widely. The top $20\%$ of
recruiters (Q5) accounted for $42.1\%$ of all participants,
while the lowest quintile (Q1) recruited just $3.2\%.$ GPs
with a doctorate degree recruited more patients (IRR = 1.45,
p < 0.05). Higher perceived workload was linked to increased
recruitment engagement (IRR = 1.30, p < 0.1). In contrast,
larger practice teams were associated with lower perceived
workload (OR = 0.71, p < 0.1).GP recruitment performance and
perceived workload are closely linked, influenced by both
individual research interest and structural support. The
disproportionate recruitment burden among a small subset of
GPs highlights the need for strategies to engage low
recruiters and support high performers. Strengthening
practice-based research networks, could help make research
involvement more feasible for a wider range of GPs. Trail
registration: German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS; trial
identifier: DRKS00013555); Date of Registration:
2017-12-07.The online version contains supplementary
material available at 10.1186/s12875-025-02948-1.},
keywords = {Barriers and facilitators (Other) / General practitioner
(Other) / Patient recruitment (Other) / Practice-based
research networks (Other) / Randomized controlled trial
(Other)},
cin = {AG Thyrian},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-2719)1510800},
pnm = {353 - Clinical and Health Care Research (POF4-353)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-353},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:40764906},
pmc = {pmc:PMC12326823},
doi = {10.1186/s12875-025-02948-1},
url = {https://pub.dzne.de/record/280231},
}